Solved

AMD: What am I buying?

Posted on 2002-05-28
10
189 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-26
Ok, I need a new computer and I decided on a AMD 1800+.  From what i've read, it is equivalent to a Intel 2Ghz machine but then i've also read that it can't be compared because the amount of work per cycle is different.  So, can anyone tell me in plain english.  What the heck am I planning on buying?

Why should I choose an AMD over an Intel?
Thanks,
myuen
0
Comment
Question by:myuen
10 Comments
 
LVL 14

Accepted Solution

by:
tmj883 earned 50 total points
ID: 7040579
Plain English...the AMD1800+ actually runs at 1530MHz but  the AMD processor is able to perform 9 operations per clock cycle compared to Intel's P4 which is able to perform only 6 operations per clock cycle. AMD feels that giving a "performance rating" (ie, 1800+) designation to their processors is more marketable to consumers. In other words the AMD 1800+(1530MHz) will perform as many operations as an Intel P4(1800MHz) per clock cycle. To me, this is a blunder by AMD. It is confusing. None the less, benchmarks support AMD's assertion.
You should choose AMD because they are more cost efficient, and Intel is overated/overpriced. I see no performance advantage in cpus with the same number of operation per clock cycle. This is where it gets down to the price...keep in mind...price per operations per clock cycle...and do the math...T
0
 
LVL 14

Expert Comment

by:tmj883
ID: 7040589
P.S.
Memory Bandwidth also has an effect of cpu performance with RambusDRAM holding the edge, but in actual performance that is benchmarked, this advantage over DDR is small.T
0
 
LVL 18

Expert Comment

by:centerv
ID: 7040681
An amd 1800 with ddr ram AND at least ata 100-7200 rpm hard
drives with a 64 meg ddr graphics card will give you excellent fast
performance at a reasonable price to run anything on the market that you may encounter for some time to come.
0
The Eight Noble Truths of Backup and Recovery

How can IT departments tackle the challenges of a Big Data world? This white paper provides a roadmap to success and helps companies ensure that all their data is safe and secure, no matter if it resides on-premise with physical or virtual machines or in the cloud.

 
LVL 18

Expert Comment

by:Crash2100
ID: 7040752
my last three computers have been amd, and I have had great success with all of them.  I would highly recommend amd over intel.  Best of all, amd's are cheaper and the motherboards tend to have more features.

Athlon XP Has The Lead Over Pentium 4
http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/01q4/011031/xpvsp4-15.html
0
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:Smokintbird
ID: 7040839
good awnser "tmj883" !!

I'm impresed, it's rare to find someone who'll put any thouhgt into a comment these days.  I learned something I didn't know, and you have my vote for the expert points.

BTW, IMNSHO, AMD is the all around best processor on the market.  There's no way I'd buy an intel, their performance for my tasks just doesn't compare to that of an identical AMD.
0
 
LVL 14

Expert Comment

by:tmj883
ID: 7040947
I would agree with the other experts that an AthlonXP cpu, DDR333, ATA133, USB2.0, maybe IDE RAID, and a good DDR video card would make the basis of a great system for some time to come(how long?). This type of system can be built much cheaper than a comparable Intel and as Crash2100 pointed out, more features(overclocking/monitoring). T
0
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:pjknibbs
ID: 7041100
I'll add my voice to the AMD crowd. Just to give a trivial example, the SETI@Home client takes around 7-8 hours to process a workunit on a 1.6GHz P4, whereas my 1.2GHz Athlon can do the same thing in 6 hours. What sort of performance you get does depend what applications you run--either an Athlon or a P4 will run office applications beautifully, but then, so would an old Pentium 200, so that's maybe not meaningful!
0
 

Expert Comment

by:malfisher
ID: 7041153
I would just like to add that if you do go AMD (my last 4 PC's have been AMD) be sure to get some good cooling. The last one I built around a Duron 800, has been very good, but needed additional cooling in the case to run cool. But I believe that is because I opted for a cheap heatsink/fan on the CPU. Otherwise I agree, the price difference between the Intel and AMD products seems hard to justify.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:myuen
ID: 7042207
Thanks tmj883!

You said the magic words I was looking for.
Of to buy an AMD I go.
0
 
LVL 14

Expert Comment

by:tmj883
ID: 7043224
Good luck with your new system, my Thunderbird is an awesome performer with stability to match, hope yours turns out the same. T
0

Featured Post

Announcing the Most Valuable Experts of 2016

MVEs are more concerned with the satisfaction of those they help than with the considerable points they can earn. They are the types of people you feel privileged to call colleagues. Join us in honoring this amazing group of Experts.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Every server (virtual or physical) needs a console: and the console can be provided through hardware directly connected, software for remote connections, local connections, through a KVM, etc. This document explains the different types of consol…
This is about my first experience with programming Arduino.
Two types of users will appreciate AOMEI Backupper Pro: 1 - Those with PCIe drives (and haven't found cloning software that works on them). 2 - Those who want a fast clone of their boot drive (no re-boots needed) and it can clone your drive wh…

789 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question