Solved

Quick Watchguard Question

Posted on 2002-05-29
2
466 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-16
My company has bought a new Watchguard Firebox 3 4500 firewall that I'm setting up an initial config for.

My question is this:

What's better practice when setting up static NAT for inbound connections to web servers, smtp gateways, etc...

1)Add the external addresses to the external aliases tab under network configuration.  Then when configuring a rule, create an instance of a static NAT mapping from the available external address to the internal address.

2)Don't add the external addresses to the external aliases tab under network configuration.  Instead, under NAT, add each of the internal addresses as exceptions to the dynamic NAT rules and add 1-1 static NAT mappings for the addresses in question.
The benefit that I can see of doing this is that it makes rule configuration much easier as you only specify the internal address of the host in question.
0
Comment
Question by:hstiles
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
2 Comments
 
LVL 1

Accepted Solution

by:
asweinstein earned 100 total points
ID: 7103620
There is no need to setup static 1-1 NAT as stated in option 2, unless you have an application that demands it. For example, if you had multiple Citrix servers behind the firewall, 1-1 NAT for those would be appropriate. This is pretty much true for any situation where you will be hosting several servers using the same port numbers behind the Firebox. For an installation with a single server of each type (web, smtp, etc...) dynamic NAT will work fine. Static 1-1 NAT is also required to support outbound IPSEC connections.
0
 
LVL 13

Author Comment

by:hstiles
ID: 7103693
I should have come back to this question sooner.  I actually worked out during the installation of said Firebox that just a standard inbound NATting rule is sufficient for most situations.

I did have to use some 1-1 NATting as we have a distributed printing application that requires an initial handshake between the document server and host before printing can commence.
0

Featured Post

Get 15 Days FREE Full-Featured Trial

Benefit from a mission critical IT monitoring with Monitis Premium or get it FREE for your entry level monitoring needs.
-Over 200,000 users
-More than 300,000 websites monitored
-Used in 197 countries
-Recommended by 98% of users

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Uncontrolled local administrators groups within any organization pose a huge security risk. Because these groups are locally managed it becomes difficult to audit and maintain them.
Here's a look at newsworthy articles and community happenings during the last month.
Sending a Secure fax is easy with eFax Corporate (http://www.enterprise.efax.com). First, just open a new email message. In the To field, type your recipient's fax number @efaxsend.com. You can even send a secure international fax — just include t…
Sometimes it takes a new vantage point, apart from our everyday security practices, to truly see our Active Directory (AD) vulnerabilities. We get used to implementing the same techniques and checking the same areas for a breach. This pattern can re…
Suggested Courses

623 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question