Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of tduplantis
tduplantis

asked on

Native VLAN Mismatch

We have a Catalyst 2924XL with 4 port fiber module, each goes to another 2924 switch, usually port 24.  I am getting this error message on the switches that are connected to the backbone switch via fiber:

%CDP-4-NATIVE_VLAN_MISMATCH: Native VLAN mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/24 (0), with SWI01_RPCHM01.rpc.net FastEthernet1/1 (1)

Of course the interface is different with all the errors, 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4.

Whats strange about this is every port on all of the switches are assigned to VLAN 1, the default VLAN.  I did a show vlan and everything looks fine.

Any Ideas?
Avatar of geoffryn
geoffryn

What does a "sho cdp nei" say?
Avatar of tduplantis

ASKER

This is the core router.

RTR03_RPCHM01  Fas 0/24   150    R   2620      Fas 0/0
RTR01_RPCHM01  Fas 0/24   153    R   3620      Eth 0/0
SWI07_RPCHM01  Fas 1/2    172    S   WS-C2924C-Fas 0/24
SWI06_RPCHM01  Fas 1/1    155    S   WS-C2924C-Fas 0/24
SWI04_RPCHM01  Fas 1/4    177    S   WS-C2924C-Fas 0/24
SWI03_RPCHM01  Fas 1/3    158    S   WS-C2924C-Fas 0/24

This is SWI07_RPCHM01

SWI01_RPCHM01.rpc  Fas 0/24 149  T S   WS-C2924M-Fas 1/2
SWI08_RPCHM01      Fas 0/23 152  T S   WS-C2924C-Fas 0/24



I'm not sure why it is saying SWI01_RPCHM01.rpc(.net), you think this can cause a problem?
Can you post the VLAN config from both switches?
CORE SWITCH:

VLAN Name                             Status    Ports
---- -------------------------------- --------- -------------------------------
1    default                          active    Fa0/1, Fa0/2, Fa0/3, Fa0/4,
                                                Fa0/5, Fa0/6, Fa0/7, Fa0/8,
                                                Fa0/9, Fa0/10, Fa0/11, Fa0/12,
                                                Fa0/13, Fa0/14, Fa0/15, Fa0/16,
                                                Fa0/17, Fa0/18, Fa0/19, Fa0/20,
                                                Fa0/21, Fa0/22, Fa0/23, Fa0/24,
                                                Fa1/1, Fa1/2, Fa1/3, Fa1/4
1002 fddi-default                     active
1003 token-ring-default               active
1004 fddinet-default                  active
1005 trnet-default                    active

VLAN Type  SAID       MTU   Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp  BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2
---- ----- ---------- ----- ------ ------ -------- ---- -------- ------ ------
1    enet  100001     1500  -      -      -        -    -        1002   1003
1002 fddi  101002     1500  -      -      -        -    -        1      1003
1003 tr    101003     1500  1005   0      -        -    srb      1      1002
1004 fdnet 101004     1500  -      -      1        ibm  -        0      0
1005 trnet 101005     1500  -      -      1        ibm  -        0      0


ONE THAT IS GETTING ERRORS:


VLAN Name                             Status    Ports
---- -------------------------------- --------- -------------------------------
1    default                          active    Fa0/1, Fa0/2, Fa0/3, Fa0/4,
                                                Fa0/5, Fa0/6, Fa0/7, Fa0/8,
                                                Fa0/9, Fa0/10, Fa0/11, Fa0/12,
                                                Fa0/13, Fa0/14, Fa0/15, Fa0/16,
                                                Fa0/17, Fa0/18, Fa0/19, Fa0/20,
                                                Fa0/21, Fa0/22, Fa0/23, Fa0/24
1002 fddi-default                     active
1003 token-ring-default               active
1004 fddinet-default                  active
1005 trnet-default                    active

VLAN Type  SAID       MTU   Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp  BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2
---- ----- ---------- ----- ------ ------ -------- ---- -------- ------ ------
1    enet  100001     1500  -      -      -        -    -        1002   1003
1002 fddi  101002     1500  -      -      -        -    -        1      1003
1003 tr    101003     1500  1005   0      -        -    srb      1      1002
1004 fdnet 101004     1500  -      -      1        ibm  -        0      0
1005 trnet 101005     1500  -      -      1        ibm  -        0      0
SWI06_RPCHM01#
Do you have any ports configured as trunks?
Yes, I have 7 of them setup on the core switch. Here is config:

Building configuration...

Current configuration:
!
version 12.0
no service pad
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
service password-encryption
!
hostname SWI01_RPCHM01
!
no logging console
enable secret 5 $1$JE5M$SJwn.lTMBNQkRMevTzD0d0
!
!
!
!
!
!
spanning-tree vlan 1 priority 100
ip subnet-zero
!
!
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 port group 1
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/2
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 port group 1
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/3
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/4
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/5
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 port group 3
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/6
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 port group 3
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/7
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 port group 4
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/8
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 port group 4
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/9
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 port group 5
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/10
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 port group 5
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/11
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/12
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/13
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 port group 7
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/14
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 port group 7
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/15
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/16
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/17
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/18
 description XXXXX
 duplex full
 speed 100
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/19
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/20
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/21
!
interface FastEthernet0/22
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/23
 spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/24
 description 12 Port 3COM Switch (Connected to PORT 1)
!
interface FastEthernet1/1
!
interface FastEthernet1/2
!
interface FastEthernet1/3
!
interface FastEthernet1/4
!
interface VLAN1
 ip address 10.1.3.4 255.255.255.0
 no ip directed-broadcast
 no ip route-cache
!
ip default-gateway 192.168.1.1
snmp-server engineID local 00000009020000502AE4B0C0
snmp-server community private RW
snmp-server community public RO
snmp-server location 2nd Floor - RPC-Houma, LA
snmp-server contact David Landry
snmp-server chassis-id Sun
banner motd ^C
WARNING: The unauthorized use of devices or the tampering with access
         to this network and its resources are CRIMINAL offenses!

             ***** ALL VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION *****^C
!
line con 0
 transport input none
 stopbits 1
line vty 0 4
 password 7 050A081B2D495C5B4A
 login
line vty 5 15
 password 7 050A081B2D495C5B4A
 login
!
end

SWI01_RPCHM01#
Strange, I just noticed that default gateway statement in there, that shouldn't be in there at all.
Well it should be, but its wrong. I corrected it, wonder if that was causing the problem? Especially considering all the other switches are pointed to the proper default gateway.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of geoffryn
geoffryn

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Well it should be, but its wrong. I corrected it, wonder if that was causing the problem? Especially considering all the other switches are pointed to the proper default gateway.
We are not using vlans for anything.
This has been resolved and was a cosmetic error only.  One of our switches was running Version 12.0(5.4)WC(1) which has a bug associated with CDP version 2.  We set all switches to CDP version 1 and the error went away.  Thanks everyone for your responses.
Thanks Geoffryn for your help on this, I called Cisco to get is resolved, but I learned a lot from our discussion.  Have a great one!