Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of smisk
smisk

asked on

RedHat 7.2 and Win2k

OK, I have an installed version of Win2k Server running on my computer.  I plop in the RedHat 7.2 CD and choose to install LILO on the MBR with LBA32 support.  I previously had a dual boot between Win2k and Win98 so I just repartitioned the Win98 drive and installed over that.  Now when I reboot, RedHat comes up fine through Lilo.  When I choose Win2k from the Lilo prompt it says "Starting Win2k" and hangs.  I think I overwrote the NT boot loader.

Is there any way to recover from this?  Even if I have to reinstall Win2k I really want to get this dual boot setup properly...
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of jsnorman
jsnorman

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of smisk
smisk

ASKER

I think it's lilo that is saying "Starting Win2k" because Win2k is the lilo name for that os (it doesn't say "Starting Windows 2000" like it usual does).  But I will try the repair feature and hope that it works...

Thanks,
Steve
Let me know.  If you were missing NTLDR, the likely error message would be "NTLDR missing or not found" (I have had this happen to me many many times!!!!).  

Also, be aware that the repair option of Windows 2000 MAY overwrite the LILO boot sector of the MBA with Windows own MBR sector.  If so, of course you just have to boot with your boot disk into Linux and rerun LILO after repairing WIndows 2000.
It appears that the numbering of the OS in the MBR has chaged.
1. Get any version of Ranish Partition Manager from
   http://www.ranish.com/part/. Unzip and copy partXXX.exe
   on a floppy. (where XXX is the version)
2. Boot into plain DOS from floppy. Run partXXX.exe from
   the above floppy.
3. MBR will be displayed. Change numbering of the Win2k
   to 1 or 2 (try with both entries). F2 to save.
4. Reboot.

Best Wishes.
Avatar of smisk

ASKER

Actually, this was resolved by reinstalling Win2k.  Linux boots fine with a boot disk, which is good enough.

Thanks for the help.  I wish I could delete the question...
smisk:
This old question needs to be finalized -- accept an answer, split points, or get a refund.  For information on your options, please click here-> http:/help/closing.jsp#1 
EXPERTS:
Post your closing recommendations!  No comment means you don't care.

No comment has been added lately, so it's time to clean up this TA.
I will leave a recommendation in the Cleanup topic area that this question is:

Accept jsnorman's answer as this would be the approach that I would use even though smisk went for the complete re-install
Please leave any comments here within the next seven days.

PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS COMMENT AS AN ANSWER!

pjedmond
EE Cleanup Volunteer