• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 302
  • Last Modified:

EJB: static references on a LocalHome

Hi,

we are in need of some sort of utility class that resolves finder functionality for us. This should provide methods in the form of findXXXByPK(String) or findYYYByName(String), returning a local reference.
We have some different opinions on how to code this best, considering performance and "political correctness" of the code and code placement.

The first version would be a stateless session bean that instantiates all necessary home interfaces in the ejbCreate() method to use them later. Advantage: clean, nice code. Disadvantage: Every SessionBean using this SessionBean needs to make a new JNDI lookup to get this utility class.

Second version is a regular class (not an EJB) that can be accessed statically to provide these methods. This class would instantiate the relevant home interfaces in a static context and call find methods on these home interfaces from its static methods. Advantage: probably better performance than first version and easier access without JNDI lookup. Disadvantage: I am not sure if those static home interfaces are evil.

I know this might be an ethical question about code beauty, but I would like to hear some input on this.

thanks,
  exorcist.

0
exorcist
Asked:
exorcist
1 Solution
 
fi76631Commented:
Hmmm...

Best solution for what you propose is similar to option two above. You should use the singleton pattern.

Static home interfaces work just fine. I use this approach a lot and it makes my code run a lot faster.

Specifically, what I do is have a client wrapper for each EJB. This abstracts the fact from the caller of the bean that they are interacting with a bean. The client is a singleton that loads the specific home interfaces on creation.

Calls to the bean are very simple:

Result = myBeanClient.sInstance().beanMethod(...);

Obviously, the beanClient is derived from a baseBeanClient class that does all of the work. Each bean client has only a hand full of lines of code...so each client can be written in about 10 seconds!

Its quick, simple, controllable and it works!
0
 
exorcistAuthor Commented:
90% of the answer is actually off topic, but since it's the only answer....
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Introducing Cloud Class® training courses

Tech changes fast. You can learn faster. That’s why we’re bringing professional training courses to Experts Exchange. With a subscription, you can access all the Cloud Class® courses to expand your education, prep for certifications, and get top-notch instructions.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now