Solved

GDI leak?

Posted on 2002-07-11
8
638 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-03
Hi,

I use this code under Windows 2000:

HBRUSH hBrushTest;
hBrushTest = CreateSolidBrush( RGB(0,0,0) );
DeleteObject( hBrushTest );

After the creation of the brush, the GDI count in the task manager (when you show that column) increases by one. Unfortunately, the count doesn't decrease after the deletion of the brush.

What's wrong with this picture???
0
Comment
Question by:mahtieubrault
8 Comments
 
LVL 32

Expert Comment

by:jhance
ID: 7147943
I don't think that proves a leak.  What if you do:

HBRUSH hBrushTest;

for(int i=0; i<1000; i++){
  hBrushTest = CreateSolidBrush( RGB(0,0,0) );
  DeleteObject( hBrushTest );
}

Does your resource count decrease by 1000?  I think not.
0
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:pjknibbs
ID: 7148455
I wonder if Windows is being a bit clever here. The brush you're creating there is identical to what you'd get if you did a GetStockObject(BLACK_BRUSH), so maybe Windows is actually setting up and returning the default object?
0
 

Author Comment

by:mahtieubrault
ID: 7148910
By doing the loop 1000 times, it increases the GDI count by 10. And it won't be cleared until the application is closed.  If it's in a dialog that's going to be used only once, I don't want the resources to stay in memory after using the dialog.

Any idea?
0
Salesforce Made Easy to Use

On-screen guidance at the moment of need enables you & your employees to focus on the core, you can now boost your adoption rates swiftly and simply with one easy tool.

 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:charlass
ID: 7149077
The good news is however, never the mind how many times you are running this loop (I did it until 30.000) the GDI handle count just climbs up by 10. But you are right, it is quite strange.
0
 
LVL 32

Expert Comment

by:jhance
ID: 7149319
>>I don't want the resources to stay in memory after using the dialog.

Then don't allocate them.  You DO NOT have direct control over how or when Windows manages its resources.  As long as you "clean up" every object you create, you won't leak terminally.  Windows caches object store in the assumption that it will likely be reused before the app exits.

If you don't want ANY resources used, then don't allocate any, but, of course, that generally results in a useless application.
0
 

Accepted Solution

by:
modulo earned 0 total points
ID: 10787458
PAQed - no points refunded (of 200)

modulo
Community Support Moderator
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: ZipGrep

ZipGrep is a utility that can list and search zip (.war, .ear, .jar, etc) archives for text patterns, without the need to extract the archive's contents.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way to say thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

This article describes a technique for converting RTF (Rich Text Format) data to HTML and provides C++ source that does it all in just a few lines of code. Although RTF is coming to be considered a "legacy" format, it is still in common use... po…
For a while now I'v been searching for a circular progress control, much like the one you get when first starting your Silverlight application. I found a couple that were written in WPF and there were a few written in Silverlight, but all appeared o…
This is Part 3 in a 3-part series on Experts Exchange to discuss error handling in VBA code written for Excel. Part 1 of this series discussed basic error handling code using VBA. http://www.experts-exchange.com/videos/1478/Excel-Error-Handlin…
This video shows how to use Hyena, from SystemTools Software, to bulk import 100 user accounts from an external text file. View in 1080p for best video quality.

830 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question