Odd QBASIC error...

I'd really like to get some suggestions about this:

I wrote a small data acquisition program. The setup involves a 16-bit A/D converter card and a 3-axis geophone. The program gets the values from the 3 active channels, plots 3 curves and stores the values in a file in a comma-delimited text format. I used Z-Basic for this, a real oldie (end of the 80's) and it works quite OK. I figured QBASIC could give better graphics, so I adjusted the program for QB (a few small adjustments). One thing will not work:

ZBASIC
VALUE = INP(&H225)*256 + INP(&H224)
This gets the 16 bit output fromt he card for further handling.

QBASIC
VALUE = (INP(&H225)*256) + INP(&H224)
This gives an "Overflow" error. Syntax adjustments (moving or deleting parenthesis) does not help. If I read only the low byte ( INP(&H224) ) it works, but the function is crippled.

This line works (no Overflow), but with odd behaviour:
VALUE = (INP(&H225)*256 AND &HF) + INP(&H224)
... and I cannot understand why.


Any input would be appreciated. I am not an experienced programmer - I just follow the manual - so don't hesitate to point out the obvious!

Cheers
/RID
LVL 31
ridAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Webinar] Streamline your web hosting managementRegister Today

x
 
SunBowConnect With a Mentor Commented:
done?
Without doing math or numbers or logic, since this may be over already, I suspect a something beyond limits anyway (if only presumed).

Another workaround to save on development time is to segregate the two operands where the overflow occurs. You know, make more variables, then add them together. You may later need to revisit this for speed in real time system, but it should resolve the error.

Also, since error is on the *256 operation, (a magic number) there could be a number of other workarounds. Maybe swapping operands (order) as well, if this is done Polish in one language and not in other.

Used to be that shifting the bits would help increase the speed
0
 
hesCommented:
Have you tried making VALUE a long integer (VALUE&)
0
 
ridAuthor Commented:
Project is resting presently (nighttime here), but I'll check this and get back here forthwith.

/RID
0
The new generation of project management tools

With monday.com’s project management tool, you can see what everyone on your team is working in a single glance. Its intuitive dashboards are customizable, so you can create systems that work for you.

 
ridAuthor Commented:
It doesn't work. It's not like the value is beyond limits, but the program errors out as soon as the line is read, highlighting the variable name and saying "Overflow".

Regards
/RID
0
 
ridAuthor Commented:
I'll try the thing about breaking it down and creating more variables. It'll take a few days to get back with this, but I hope for your patient approach.

Regards
/RID
0
 
SunBowCommented:
I'm not sure I could add much, assuming you know what I refer to. But another thought is that this is a problem very similar to handling of IP addresses, in terms of succeeding with hex conversions, decimal, and overflows. In that there may be similar treatments to problem searching handlers for that. Overflow can happen on RHS of equation without examining LHS due to nature of compiler in both assumptions made and in whether math goes left to right or from right to left (which is why adding more and more parens don't help resolve)

I am certain that you can resolve on own with variables now. But another issue that could crop is speed, since the variables will likely slow it down, ever so little, but you want real time access (fast) as well as drawing of graphs (slower, slower). While this ought to work out, its handling may maintain interest.
0
 
ridAuthor Commented:
Valid comments, thank you.

As I don't need sample rate higher than 100S/s, I think it should work out OK, even with more variables/steps. As soon as I get access to the machine I'll try it out and get back here.

/RID
0
 
nico5038Commented:

No comment has been added lately, so it's time to clean up this TA.
I will leave a recommendation in the Cleanup topic area that this question is:
 - Answered by: Hes (50) rid (50) SunBow (50)
Please leave any comments here within the
next seven days.

PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS COMMENT AS AN ANSWER !

Nic;o)
0
 
ridAuthor Commented:
Sorry... forgot all bout this. Making several variables was a working solution. However, the problem seems to be machine-specific (original prog works on one machine, not on another) so I was submerged in trial runs and forgot about closing the Q.

Cheers
/RID
0
 
nico5038Commented:
Thanks for finalizing rid !

Nic;o)
0
All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.