carollow
asked on
Active Directory
Hi,
I'll be implemeting a DHCP/WINS on a Win2K, just wondering will it be better in a Active Directory environment ? There will be multiple PDC on different subnet available.
Your comments will be appreciated.
Thanks
I'll be implemeting a DHCP/WINS on a Win2K, just wondering will it be better in a Active Directory environment ? There will be multiple PDC on different subnet available.
Your comments will be appreciated.
Thanks
One advantage of using DNS in Active Directory is that the zone information is automatically transferred between the servers, requiring less setup on the second DNS server and every one from that point. Once you have DNS installed and configured on one domain controller, all you will have to do is install the DNS service on each new server.
Active directory is only for DHCP/WINS??? No that is not a good practice. But if you are migrating entire NT4.0 to W2K and keeping BDCs, I think better to go with AD mixed mode, DHCP, WINS and ADI DNS Zones.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
This question is still open and getting old. If any of the comment(s) above helped you please accept it as an answer or split the points who ever helped you in this question. Your attention in finalising this question is very much appreciated. Thanks in advance,
****** PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS AS AN ANSWER ********
- If you would like to close this question and have your points refunded, please post a question in community support area on https://www.experts-exchange.com/Community_Support/ giving the address of this question. Thank you
Pasha
Cleanup Volunteer
****** PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS AS AN ANSWER ********
- If you would like to close this question and have your points refunded, please post a question in community support area on https://www.experts-exchange.com/Community_Support/ giving the address of this question. Thank you
Pasha
Cleanup Volunteer