Nortel to Cisco Wan Link

I have a nortel Router in one site runing LLC, IP and ospf. I need to put a cisco at the other end of the Wan link. I have verfied that the T1 is good by having 2 Cisco's at each end and 2 nortel routers on the ckt. when i mix the rotuers i have can not get the circuirt up and running. I have configured both ends with IP and the proper subnet.
enc PPP

I am not sure where to go from here.
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

If you are using ppp encapsulation, on the Cisco side, try setting the serial interface mtu to 1492 to match the Nortel
JaysonJacksonAuthor Commented:
Tried setting the MTU to 1492 no line still down. I belive the LLC layer is not comming up and i am not sure why.
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
It's been awhile since I worked with a Nortel router (actually, they were called Bay routers back then :-)). but I recall them having two serial encapsulations Standard (which was Bay's HDLC) and PPP. When we connected a Bay to a Cisco using serial links, we set the interfaces to PPP on both ends.

When Nortel acquired Bay, did they change the terminology and now they're refering to PPP as LLC?

Ultimate Tool Kit for Technology Solution Provider

Broken down into practical pointers and step-by-step instructions, the IT Service Excellence Tool Kit delivers expert advice for technology solution providers. Get your free copy now.

Found this on a nortel FAQ site. I had the MTU adjustment at the wrong end. Agree w/Don that you need a common encapsulation at both ends
How do I get a Bay to talk to a Cisco on a Pt-Pt line?
last updated: 5/18/1999

A. Both Cisco & Bay default to a proprietary HDLC on WAN circuits. So, they won't talk to each other by default.

However, you can use PPP, which is an RFC standard WAN protocol, and get them to communicate.

Hang on a minute, first. You also have to change the default MTU sizes.

Bay defaults to 1600 bytes and Cisco defaults to 1500. Also, Bay doesn't include the datalink header in its MTU count. So, you should set the Bay's MTU to 1506 and leave the Cisco to it's default.

Test it by sending a 2000-byte ping through. If it works, then the MTU size is fragmentting correctly.

If you need clocking, then let the Cisco provide it.


Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
JaysonJacksonAuthor Commented:
This work with a little more research but this pointed me in the correct direction.
What was your final thing that made it work?
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.