Dual Boot Redhat linux 7.3 & windows NT

Hi,

I have two hard disks, master and slave. I have windows Nt installed on the master and redhat linux 7.3 on the slave.
While installing redhat, I set the linux grub to boot from the master disk. When I try to start up my PC, i only get linux but not windows.I unplugged the slave drive, but still I get linux. how can I get to windows NT??please help.

-Mike
redsox34Asked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

victorbxCommented:
Edit /etc/grub.conf and add the lines


title Windows 2000
rootnoverify (hd0,0)
chainloader +1
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
paullamhkgCommented:
Actually the grub.conf is in /boot/grub/, and because you install the GRUB in the MBR (Master Boot Record), so even you unplugged the linux still have the same result.

victorbx already gave you good hints, but I will change it like below

#
# Sample boot menu configuration file
#

# Boot automatically after a minute.
timeout 60

# By default, boot the second entry.
default 1

# Fallback to the first entry.
fallback 0

title Windows 2000
unhide (hd0,0)
hide (hd0,1)
hide (hd0,2)
rootnoverify (hd0,0)
chainloader +1
makeactive

# For booting Linux
title  Linux
root (hd0,7)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4 root=/dev/hda8 video=matrox:vesa:261

read here for more info abt GRUB http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Multiboot-with-GRUB-2.html#ss2.3
0
GnsCommented:
Um, Paul... Do you know something we don't? As I read it, all that is needed is what victorbx suggests, since the hide/unhide wouldn't be needed in this case (NT/2k/xp don't strictly need be on the first drives first partition... but it already is... And no other "strangeness" either:-).

-- Glenn
0
Ultimate Tool Kit for Technology Solution Provider

Broken down into practical pointers and step-by-step instructions, the IT Service Excellence Tool Kit delivers expert advice for technology solution providers. Get your free copy now.

paullamhkgCommented:
Glenn I know we should not suggest someone already comments, and I've already clarify victorbx give the good hints, for the hide/unhide I'm not sure, I use it all the time, may be I should take it out too.

Paul
0
GnsCommented:
Might be worth a go:-). As I said, the hide/unhide is there to "help" situations where some OS has strict limitations on where it can boot from... Pretty much like the makeactive that simply ensure that the partition has a (possibly spurious) "active" or "bootable" bit set in the partition table.
The OS needing this kind of crutch is mostly DOS and it's descendants (graphical shells like w9x, wme ...).
So unless you have any of those, you should be fine without the hide/unhide. My guess is that none of the OSes involved (linux or nt/2k/xp?) would have any problems.

-- Glenn
0
paullamhkgCommented:
Glenn

how abt the makeactive should I keep ?

Paul

ps redsox34, I should not use your TA to ask question, but I think this can also give you idea so please forgive me:)
0
paullamhkgCommented:
Sorry Glenn I re read your post and found you already said the answer, please ignore my question.
0
GnsCommented:
Depends on whether the OS needs it or not. I don't think ntldr needs it, but I've actually never tested that... at least what I can remember:-). Yeah I'm chicken... and lazy:-):-).
Try it! It wont keep you from booting linux, so it'll be easy to change back;-).
Only confirmed that DOS&friends need it... I suspect most others dont care.

-- Glenn
0
GnsCommented:
Fast typing today Paul:-).

Rgrds

-- Glenn
0
paullamhkgCommented:
Not so many drink last night, still awake that's why :P

Paul
0
GnsCommented:
Drinks on a monday/tuesday... Lucky man (or the begginings of a bad habit:-). I spent last night battling Oracle9iR2 on a RH9. No fun at all... Since Oracle still cling to the terminal stupidity of relinking .o files for their products... It's spelled glibc i-n-c-o-m-p-a-t-i-b-i-l-i-t-y! I could sure have used a drink or two there and then:-).

Sorry redsox34 for this just turning off-topic.

-- Glenn
0
paullamhkgCommented:
This month is the birthday and wedding month of my friends, I got 4 invitation for wedding parties, 5-6 birthday parties that why drinking on week days, normally only on weekend for me :)

Are u talking abt Oracle9i? I did a success install, but after the memory problem I need to reinstall into anonther server, but fail, still trying trying and trying, which make me crazy, may be I take another drink will help :)
0
GnsCommented:
Yeah, and go look at http://www.puschitz.com/InstallingOracle9i.shtml#OracleInstallationErrors if you haven't already. Saved me some hairpulling (not much thiough, since the OEM repository install triggered pretty much everything on that page).

Be well

-- Glenn
0
paullamhkgCommented:
Thanks Glenn, it's very helpful :)
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Linux

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.