input/ output redirection and pipelining

I am writing a mini shell, but I am having trouble with input/ output redirection when it comes to reading the input from one file, execute a command on that input and then redirect the output to another file.

An example would be:

tac <myInput >myOutput

I was able to write the code if there was either one of the two (input or output), but I'm having trouble with the code for using both of them at the same time.

I tried creating a pipe but I was unsuccessful.
This is what I did (the program is pretty big so I will just show the pipe part)
int sd1[2];
int sd2[2];

pipe(sd1);
pipe(sd2);
sd1[0] = open(files[1],O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC,S_IRWXU);
sd2[1] = open(files[0],O_RDONLY,S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR);

if (fork()==0)
{
             close(sd1[0]);          
             close(sd2[1]);          

             dup2(sd1[1],0);    
             dup2(sd2[0],1);    
                execvp(comm[0],comm); // this is the command line within my shell
}
else if (fork()>0)
{
             close(sd1[0]);              
             close(sd2[1]);
}

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks
 
cyberclaAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

mtmikeCommented:
I don't think you need a pipe. Pipes are used for two-ended communication, you can't reconnect one end to a file. I think the algorithm should be:

- open the input and output file
- duplicate the opened files to the stdin (0) and stdout (1) file descriptors.
- call exec to execute the new process

You can open the files in the child process (after forking) so you don't need to close them in the parent.

Calling fork twice doesn't seem right. Perhaps you meant:

pid = fork();
if (pid == 0) {

} else if (pid > 0) {

}
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
cyberclaAuthor Commented:
You are right, I didnt need a pipe. I managed to get it to work

int fd1, fd2;
  int dummy;
  char *newargv[2];

  if (fork() == 0) {
    fd1 = open("f1", O_RDONLY);

    if (fd1 < 0) {perror("catf1f2: f1"); exit(1);}
 
    if (dup2(fd1, 0) != 0) {perror("catf1f2: dup2(f1, 0)");exit(1);}

    close(fd1);
 
    fd2 = open("f2", O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC | O_CREAT, 0644);

    if (fd2 < 0) {perror("catf1f2: f2");exit(2);}
 
    if (dup2(fd2, 1) != 1) {perror("catf1f2: dup2(f2, 1)");exit(1);}

    close(fd2);

    newargv[0] = "tac";
    newargv[1] = (char *) 0;

    execvp("tac", newargv);
    perror("execve(bin/cat, newargv, envp)");
    exit(1);  

  } else {wait(&dummy);
  }
0
mtmikeCommented:
Looks good to me.

And you do need a pipe if you're going to implement pipelining (eg tac | cat).
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Linux OS Dev

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.