The CompTIA Cloud+ Basic training course will teach you about cloud concepts and models, data storage, networking, and network infrastructure.

OK, I've got a number (say 0.5004) and I using custom formatting I get into a string such as "5E-01". Now, my question is this, not using string methods (i.e. finding the index of "E" and use substring() to pull out the "-01" portion), is their a mathematical way to retrieve the integral value of "-01" in the scientific notated number? I'd like a method that would return the following values:

value s.n. return

0.5004 "5E-01" -1

5.004 "5E+01" +1

50.04 "5E+02" +2

etc.

Using the Math functions in C# is there a way to do this? It's been many, many years since I've taken a math course or cracked a math book, so this might be an easy question.

If there's not, would someone help me come up with the right algorithm using string methods? Thanks.

value s.n. return

0.5004 "5E-01" -1

5.004 "5E+01" +1

50.04 "5E+02" +2

etc.

Using the Math functions in C# is there a way to do this? It's been many, many years since I've taken a math course or cracked a math book, so this might be an easy question.

If there's not, would someone help me come up with the right algorithm using string methods? Thanks.

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Enjoy your complimentary solution view.

Get every solution instantly with premium.
Start your 7-day free trial.

I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

i don't know if there's anything build in (see the System.Math class)

if you really want to have a decimal equivalent of 5E-1 you can do something like this:

string text = "5E-01";

string[] values = text.ToLower().Split('e');

double val = double.Parse(values[0]);

int exponent = int.Parse(values[1]);

double ret = val * Math.Pow(10, exponent);

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trialpublic static double GetExponent(double d) {

double j;

if(d >= 1)

for(j = d; j > 10.0; j /= 10);

else

for(j = d; j < 1; j *= 10);

return Math.Log10(d/j);

}

Hope that helps,

ZRH

public static string GetScientificNotation(doub

double j;

if(d >= 1)

for(j = d; j > 10.0; j /= 10);

else

for(j = d; j < 1; j *= 10);

return j + "E" + Math.Log10(d/j);

}

ZRH

But if your asking to get a double from a string with a number in scientific notation in it, you can just use the Double.Parse(string) method.

It supports scientific notation.

But besure to catch that pesky FormatException....

ZRH

the Log function in VB 6 is the natural logarithm which is the logarithm to the base e. The constant e is approximately 2.718282.

in order to get Log Base 10, define your own function, in a Module, like this:

Public Function Log10(X) as Double

Log10 = Log(X) / Log(10#)

End Function

then if you take the Integer value of the Log10(x) you will the the number you need.

AW

.

from a math standpoint, it doesn't matter if you use natural log or base 10 log (or log base 3, 7 9 42...etc, etc). The only thing that is imprtant is that every element uses a log.

The main reason for using log base 10 is because logBase10(10) = 1

If you have an equation 370.45 = 42^n you could use a log base 42 and do a few conversions

log42(370.45) = n * log42(42) => n * 1

log42(370.45) = n

n = 1.585-ish

To keep things simple I'd just go with whatever your programming language uses as a default for its log function and just do the algebra. Converting to log base 42 makes the problem much simpler if you are doing things long hand.

As long as you've got a computer doing the work, then you don't need to make the math easy.

And using Log 10 makes the answer to beaudetious' original question almost trivial.

True, you can convert from Ln to Log 10 quite easily, to get the correct exponent for Scientific notation, but Log10 makes it much easier.

AW

However, depending upon your maintainance programmer's "ability", the string method would probably be easier to understand.

Hope that helps,

ZRH

I'll have to side with ZRH on this one...

While the string manipulation answer might be easier to understand right off, it will always be a bit slower.

However, if you are only doing this once or twice in a program, then the 20 ms longer you have to wait is really trivial. If on the other hand you have to do this 1,000, 10,000 or a million times (in a loop) then I would *strongly* encourage using the mathematical method put forth by ZRH.

20ms * 1 million itterations comes to nearly 6 hours longer to use the string function over the math version.

ps> the additional 20 ms for the string funciton is a ficticious number. It could be more or less than that number. I have not actually tested the duration.

C#

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Enjoy your complimentary solution view.

Get every solution instantly with premium.
Start your 7-day free trial.

yuppers.... you need to use logs.

.5 = 5 * 10^ -1

5 = 5 * 10^ 1

50 = 5 * 10^ 2

val = x * 10^ n

log(val) = log(x) + n*log(10) -> log(10) = 1

log(val) = log(x) + n

log(val) - log(x) = n

log(val/x) = n

So....

If your value is 5,983,899 you know your scientific notation is going to be 5.983 899 E ??

Instead of doing all the multiplication or division you can simply log(5983899/5.983899) = 6