Solved equivilant of recordset.MoveNext for DataSet

Posted on 2003-10-27
Last Modified: 2007-12-19
I can loop through all the rows in a dataset:
For each foo in bar.Dataset.Tables(0).Rows
  msgbox foo("id")

I want to be able to step through and change rows, much like we can in vb6 with the RecordSet's MoveNext(), MoveFirst() etc methods.

I want to be able to do the following but in

Do while not bar.Recordset.EOF()
    msgbox bar.recordset("id")

Question by:jasww
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
LVL 19

Accepted Solution

Dexstar earned 100 total points
ID: 9627925

> I want to be able to step through and change rows, much like we can in vb6
> with the RecordSet's MoveNext(), MoveFirst() etc methods.

According to the Documentation:

There really aren't any MoveNext() or MoveFirst() methods.  The closest you can get to is this:
    Dim i As Integer
    For i = 0 To myTable.Rows.Count - 1
    Next i

Which isn't that different from the "For Each... Next" technique.

I guess the question is, why do you need to use EOF and MoveNext()?  Why won't For For Each...Next or For I = 0 To Count...Next work for you?  Maybe I can suggest a way to get the same result if I know what you're trying to do.

Hope that helps,

Author Comment

ID: 9627975
Yeah, I've ended up using that method.
I want to be able to advance a globally scoped dataset from anywhere within the code.
Using the For Each method I am tied to this section of the code, meaning all processing has to occur within the For Each loop.
Not a big deal, I just wondered if there was a better way.

Do you think this is a step backwards for .net?  I do.  I liked MovenNext().

LVL 19

Expert Comment

ID: 9627995

> Do you think this is a step backwards for .net?  I do.  I liked MovenNext().

No, this is a step forward.  With the old style, the "current" record was a property of the recordset.  If you had 2 parts of your program trying to access 2 records at the same time, it will cause you grief because the first one will set the current record, and then the 2nd one will set the current record, and when the 1st part tries to read the data, it will read the record that the 2nd one set as current.  They conflict with each other.

With this technique, each part of the program can just get the record they want independently.  If you like MovenNext(), then you can just get the record that you want at any time with the Tables(0).Rows(n) command.

It is a little different, but you can still do whatever you need to do, and it is much more convenient for multithreaded applications.

Hope that helps,
Is Your DevOps Pipeline Leaking?

Is your CI/CD pipeline a hodge-podge of randomly connected tools? You’ve likely got a tool to fix one problem & then a different tool to fix another, resulting in a cluster of tools with overlapping functionality. Learn how to optimize your pipeline with Gartner's recommendations

LVL 96

Expert Comment

by:Bob Learned
ID: 9628322
LVL 96

Expert Comment

by:Bob Learned
ID: 10232132
No comment has been added lately, so it's time to clean up this TA.
I will leave the following recommendation for this question in the Cleanup topic area:

Split: Dexstar {http:#9627995} & TheLearnedOne {http:#9628322}

Please leave any comments here within the next seven days.

EE Cleanup Volunteer

Author Comment

ID: 10234224
Sorry for not closing sooner.

Featured Post

Revamp Your Training Process

Drastically shorten your training time with WalkMe's advanced online training solution that Guides your trainees to action.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

IP addresses can be stored in a database in any of several ways.  These ways may vary based on the volume of the data.  I was dealing with quite a large amount of data for user authentication purpose, and needed a way to minimize the storage.   …
Wouldn’t it be nice if you could test whether an element is contained in an array by using a Contains method just like the one available on List objects? Wouldn’t it be good if you could write code like this? (CODE) In .NET 3.5, this is possible…
In this video, viewers will be given step by step instructions on adjusting mouse, pointer and cursor visibility in Microsoft Windows 10. The video seeks to educate those who are struggling with the new Windows 10 Graphical User Interface. Change Cu…
There's a multitude of different network monitoring solutions out there, and you're probably wondering what makes NetCrunch so special. It's completely agentless, but does let you create an agent, if you desire. It offers powerful scalability …

688 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question