overloaded operator+

I have an assignment that I just can't quite get to work.  Here are the steps
meal class - two fields (entree/calorie count integer) include a constructor that sets meal's feilds with arguments or uses default values when no arguments are provided.  Include an overloaded insertion operator to display meal values and an overloaded extraction operator that prompts the user for entree name and calorie count for a meal
then I need an overloaded operator+() function that will add two or more meal objects(calorie values and creating a summary meal obj to store 'daily total' in entree field
the final step is to have a main program that declares for meal obj breakfast, lunch, dinner and total and include the statement total = breakfast +lunch+dinner and display values for the 4 meal obj.  

I know it's long assignment and I've tried it several ways, but I know I am missing code. I am just not sure what I am missing.  Any help would be appreciated.

#include <iostream.h>
#include <conio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <fstream.h>

class Meal
{
      friend ostream& operator<<(ostream& out, const Meal &aMeal);
      friend istream& operator>>(istream& in, Meal &aMeal);

      private:
            char *entree;
            double calories;

      public:
            Meal(char ent, int cal);
            double operator+(const Meal &Meal);
};

ostream& operator<<(ostream& out, const Meal &aMeal)
{
      out<< "Meal includes " <<aMeal.entree
            << " for " <<aMeal.calories<<endl;
      return (out);
}

istream& operator>>(istream &in, Meal &aMeal)
{

      cout<< " Enter food name ";
      in>>aMeal.entree;
      cout<< " Enter number of Calories" ;
      in>>aMeal.calories;
      cout<<endl<<" Your Food Intake" <<endl;
      return(in);
}
     


Meal::Meal(char ent, int cal)
{
      *entree = ent;
      calories = cal;
}

  double Meal::operator+(const Meal &aMeal)
  {
      double total;
      total = calories + aMeal.calories;
      return (total);
}


void main()
{

      double total;
      
      Meal Breakfast(' ',200);
    Meal Lunch(' ', 100);
    Meal Dinner(' ', 140);
      cout<<" Enter Breakfast"<<endl;
      cin>>Breakfast;
      cin>>Lunch;
      cin>>Dinner;
      
    cout<<Lunch;
      cout<<Dinner;

      total = Breakfast + Lunch;
      cout<<total<<endl;
      
      getch();
}
rediceAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

jkrCommented:
>>#include <iostream.h>
>>#include <fstream.h>

Please use

#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>

using namespace std;

instead.

>>then I need an overloaded operator+() function that will add two or more meal objects

That would be

Meal& Meal::operator+(const Meal &r) {

  calories += r.calories;

  // concatenate the strings here...
}

As you are mentioning that this is an assignment, it'd defeat the purpose to give you the whole code :o)
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
SteHCommented:
In Meal::Meal (char ent, int cal)
you assign ent to the uninitialized pointer char* entree. Can you use string instead of char*? Then
Meal::Meal (char ent, int cal) changes to
{
 entree += ent;
 calories = cal;
}
Why ist cal int and not double?


operator+ is returning a double not a Meal. Now
Meal a, b, c;
What does
 double total = a + b + c;
mean?
0
rediceAuthor Commented:
thanks for the help.  :)
0
Keep up with what's happening at Experts Exchange!

Sign up to receive Decoded, a new monthly digest with product updates, feature release info, continuing education opportunities, and more.

_ys_Commented:
BTW, the canonical format for operator+ is:

const Meal Meal::operator+(const Meal &rhs)
{
    Meal tmp ( this );  // copy construct
    tmp += rhs;         // employ operator+= to do the real work
    return tmp;
}
0
mrwad99Commented:
Yeah, SteH is basically saying that it would be better to use the string class instead of char* for simplicity.  

If you have not been taught about this class yet though:

Meal::Meal(char ent, int cal)
{
    *entree = ent;
    calories = cal;
}

is wrong.  You need to write:

Meal::Meal(char* ent, int cal)
{
    calories = cal;
    entree = new char[strlen(ent)+1];
    strcpy(entree, ent)
}

This allocates the required amount of memory that the entree is then stored in.  Of course, since you are now alloacating memory with new, you must delete it explicitly.

Hence:

Meal::~Meal()
{
    delete [] entree;
}
0
rediceAuthor Commented:
Thanks for the help again.  The class isn't for credit anyway and I'm not a programmer by any means.  Have a great day.
0
rediceAuthor Commented:
operator+ is returning a double not a Meal. Now
Meal a, b, c;
What does
 double total = a + b + c;
mean?

Not sure what it means?
0
_ys_Commented:
It means you'll need two operator= variants (or an implicit cast to a double - yuck!!)

double Meal::operator+ (const Meal& r);
double Meal::operator+ (double r);

Against all expectations though.


Better to define an accessor method for the calorie count.

double total = a.cal( ) + b.cal( ) + c.cal( );

This reads better, and is more the norm.
0
xssassCommented:
your overloaded operator+ should return the memory location of the result...

so your function definition should look like this:
 double& Meal::operator+(const Meal &aMeal);

note the & in the return type...

hope this helps.
.K.
0
jkrCommented:
>>your overloaded operator+ should return the memory location of the result...
>>so your function definition should look like this:
>> double& Meal::operator+(const Meal &aMeal);

You'd suggest to return a reference to a local variable?
0
xssassCommented:
indeed
0
jkrCommented:
And you do that without blushing?

int& foo () {

    int i = 4;

    return i;
}
0
xssassCommented:
I once used a similar thing for strings...
my code looked like this:

CString& CString::operator+( const CString& str )
{
    size_t lgth = len + str.len;
    char *t = new char[lgth + 1];
    strcpy( t, s );
    strcat( t, str.s );
    return CString(t);
}

.K.
0
jkrCommented:
You should have received a compiler warning and a memory leak at runtime.
0
xssassCommented:
well I did NOT!

and I am sorry trying to help you!

please excuse me.
.K.
0
_ys_Commented:
I wouldn't call it a memory leak ... it's more of a 'dangling reference'. The local auto variables would already have been cleaned up.

BTW, as a chuckling side-note, the original reply from jkr did have the method signature:

>> Meal& Meal::operator+(const Meal &r)

An oversight I'm sure, but still worth a chuckle.
0
tinchosCommented:
No comment has been added lately, so it's time to clean up this question.
I will leave the following recommendation for this question in the Cleanup topic area:

Split: jkr {http:#9633937} & SteH {http:#9633940} & _ys_ {http:#9634703} & xssass {http:#9959291}

Please leave any comments here within the next four days.
PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS COMMENT AS AN ANSWER!

Tinchos
EE Cleanup Volunteer
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Editors IDEs

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.