Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 350
  • Last Modified:

Mind Twister......

Hi,
  I got this question from one of the user group.. I found it quite interesting.... So I thought you people must give it a try.... I guess i know the answer but i am not that confident about it...... Its just a puzzle to puzzle you.....

class base
{
public:

      virtual void func1 ()
      {
            cout << "Base: func1" << endl;
      }
      
      void func2 ()
      {
            cout << "Base: func2" << endl;
      }
};

class derived
{
public:
      void func1 ()
      {
            cout << "Derived: func1" << endl;
      }
      
      virtual void func2 ()
      {
            cout << "Derived: func2" << endl;
      }
};


int main(void)
{
      base* pb1;
      derived d1;

      pb1=(base*)&d1;

      pb1->func1 ();
      pb1->func2 ();

 return 0 ;
}

Guess the output first..... And then try the explaination part......

Don't think the answer but know the answer ... ;-)

Dennis
0
dennis_george
Asked:
dennis_george
1 Solution
 
AxterCommented:
The result of this code is undefined according to the C++ standard.

The base class is not a base class of the derived class.
So forcing the compiler to use the wrong class type pointer for your object leads to undefined behavior.
0
 
DanRollinsCommented:
I agree with Axter.  As shown, you might as well call strcpy(), with the two parameters being a pointer to a function and a pointer to a void pointer... something might happen, but whatever it is, would be meaningless.

Perhaps the question is mis-stated.  If the object named 'derived'  is actually derived from the object named 'base' then the question might have some meaning.

-- Dan
0
 
gwapCommented:
Like axter said, the result is undefined according to the standard, however, due to the most common implementation of the C++ standard, your output should be :
Derived:func2
Base:func2

I don't need to explain the Base:func2 outcome as it is merely a static link.
The Derived:func2 outcome is because, for class base, the pb1->func2 call is translated to "the first function in the virtual function pointer table."

This virtual function pointer table is the table of Derived; furthermore, the first (and only) entry in the table of Derived is that of virtual function Derived::func2.

But like Axter said, this is implementation defined.
0
 
havman56Commented:
dennis,

Axter said is absoluetly correct behaviour undefined.

kindly dont try to test experts  knowledge in EE.
see section 10.3 of C++ standard

0

Featured Post

Upgrade your Question Security!

Your question, your audience. Choose who sees your identity—and your question—with question security.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now