+ operator commutativity

I'm writing a string class as a personal exercise. I overloaded the plus operator for char* so that I can do:

String s = "test";
s = s + "ing";

However, it is still invalid to do:

String s = "ing";
s = "test" + s;

How can I improve my implementation to support this? (I notice that the C++ standard library string class allows you to do this)

Thanks!
LVL 1
daniel_bighamAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

jkrCommented:
Use a global operator

String& operator+ ( const char* r, const String& l) {

  //...
}

and make it a 'friend' of your 'String' class if you need access to non-public members.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
DexstarCommented:
jkr:

> String& operator+ ( const char* r, const String& l) {

>   //...
> }

How could you implement that function without returning a reference to a local variable (a big no-no)?  Should it not be:
     String operator+( const char* r, const String& l ) { /* ... */ }
?

Which obviates the need for a good string class to implement reference counting.  :)

Also, if you want to be able to:
     String s2 = s1 + "blah";

Then you'll also need to define:
     String operator+( const String& r, const char* l ) { /* ... */ }

And probably:
     String operator+( const char* r, const char* l ) { /* ... */ }

Hope that helps,
Dex*
0
jkrCommented:
>>Should it not be:
>>    String operator+( const char* r, const String& l ) { /* ... */ }

Yup, you are right - too many non-global operators today, I guess, so it's probably a typing habit :o)
0
daniel_bighamAuthor Commented:
Thanks guys!
0
vijay_kr_mCommented:
Hi  ,
I assume  you are using STL.
Now for your wrapper class String you have to user STL string class.
Overloading of the binary operatory "+" your implementation should be having the following

   String operator=(String  &,const char&);
   String operator=(String  &,const char*);
   String operator=(String &,String  &);
   
   String operator+=(String&,const char*);
   String operator+=(String&,const char&);
   String operator+=(String&,String&);

   String operator+(String &,const char*);
   String operator+(String &,const char&);
   String operator+(String &,String &);
You have now the freedom of either writing a friend function/Member function for implementation. Then bet u will never have any cribbings from Compiler
..regards-vijay
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
C++

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.