• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 288
  • Last Modified:

RAID Controller...

Hi all...
    I have a problem with RIAD controller. I'm trying to install RH 8.0 in a machine with 3 30Gb hdd. Linux is not recognising the hard drives..  its saying 'no hard drives found'. But when i disable the RAID card it recognises the SCSI based drives.
Is it a limitation or am i missing something here ??
Should i try RH 9.0

Thanks.
0
queryanalyzer
Asked:
queryanalyzer
  • 4
  • 2
1 Solution
 
chicagoanCommented:
Have you gone into the RAID controller bios and created a logical drive for the operating system to use?
If so, what is the brand and model# of your controller?
0
 
queryanalyzerAuthor Commented:
Hi..  
    i havent tried to go into the RAID bios. I will try that now.
Btw, my RAID controller is IBM ServeRAID -4 Ultra 160 SCSI Contoller.

Thanks.
0
 
chicagoanCommented:
Plan your array type carefully to meet your needs. It can be very time consuming to change your mind later.


With three drives, you can either create:

RAID1 - mirrors two drives (with a hot-spare) giving you 30 GB and can sustain the failure one drive which will be rebuilt automatically (the third drive could be used in JBOD mode independently for swap/temp space rather than a hot spare)

RAID5 Stripes the drives with parity, can sustain the failure of 1 drive - performance reduced until the drive is replaced and rebuilt- 60GB usable space

RAID0 a three drive stripe giving you 90GB and aggregating the performance of the drives BUT NO REDUNDANCY - the failure of any drive means ALL your data will have to be retosred
0
What Security Threats Are We Predicting for 2018?

Cryptocurrency, IoT botnets, MFA, and more! Hackers are already planning their next big attacks for 2018. Learn what you might face, and how to defend against it with our 2018 security predictions.

 
queryanalyzerAuthor Commented:
Hi...
  Think i will go with RAID 0. I want 60GB space for MySQL database.
Also i just noticed that Linux offers a software RAID option.
Which is better, the H/W based one or the S/W based.
Just going by the cost, I'm gonna have to think its the H/W based.

Thanks.
0
 
chicagoanCommented:
The HW raid offloads the raid processing to the CPU on the card, which with it's software is optimized for that task.
Note though that in the event of a controller failure, you'll have to have a strategy to get a replacement.
Note also your MTBF on that striped set is tripled as the failure of any disk toasts all your volumes, so have a backup and disaster recovery strategy in mind.
0
 
durindilCommented:
You need a driver for the RAID card so RedHat can see the RAID array
0
 
chicagoanCommented:
RH 8's hwprobe ought to pick up any mainstream raid controller and load the appropriate modules.
0

Featured Post

Enhanced Intelligibility Without Cable Clutter

Challenge: The ESA office in Brussels wanted a reliable audio conference system for video conferences. Their requirement - No participant must be left out from the conference and the audio quality must not be compromised.

  • 4
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now