Optional Parameters for Update

Hello all,

I am building an ASP application which will update a SQL Server database.

The app will, at various times, update several different fields within the same table.  For example, if I am updating a customers table, I may need to update only address one time, and only phone number another time, and still yet other times, I may need to update all fields in the table.  It seems like I shouldn't have to write separate stored procedures for each of these instances.  How can I write my stored procedure such that I can update a variable number of fields each time it is called.
knottydrdAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

amit_gCommented:
Build the update statement in ASP dynamically instead of writing the stored procedure.

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
knottydrdAuthor Commented:
I've done that in the past, but I've not been happy with the performance.  Is there a way to do it in SQL Server Stored Proc?
amit_gCommented:
There is no performance gain by using stored procedure vs. executing the dynamic sql as the SQL server caches last few queries irrespctive of its origin. Stored procedure are also cached in the same way as any other dynamic query and so they have no advantage performance wise.

You can have optional parameter in stored procedures and do what you are asking but that only complicates the code and spreads business logic in 2 places instead of one. That is a maintanace overhead. Unless you or your company has a standard of writing all queries in stored procedure, there is no need for writing stored procedures for simple queries like one line select, update and inserts.

If you still feel that you need to write a stored procedure we can tell you how to use optional parameters.
Big Business Goals? Which KPIs Will Help You

The most successful MSPs rely on metrics – known as key performance indicators (KPIs) – for making informed decisions that help their businesses thrive, rather than just survive. This eBook provides an overview of the most important KPIs used by top MSPs.

knottydrdAuthor Commented:
I'm working with an existing application in which all other db opps are done using stored procedures.
namasi_navaretnamCommented:
Amit G is absolutely right!

Here is an example.

   sSQL = ""     
   sSQL = sSQL + " Update  MyTable "
   sSQL = sSQL + " Set My_id = " + CStr(aMyId) + ",  "
   sSQL = sSQL + "     Status = 'Test.' "
   sSQL = sSQL + "  Where (Status = 'A') "

   objConn1.BeginTrans  
   objConn1.Execute sSQL
   objConn1.CommitTrans

But the easiest way to to update all fields all the time if possible. It would be easier to maintain such code that way.

Even if you do that using strored proc, pass a value to all input parameters all time. But within proc update fields where the corresponding input variables are not null.

This way you have only one proc.

 
   
amit_gCommented:
Ok. Here is how you can create a stored procedure with optional parameters ...

CREATE PROCEDURE MyStoredProcedure
       @first int = NULL
      ,@second int = NULL
      ,@third int = 0
AS

...
...
...

You can give a null value or a predetermined value to any parameter that you make an optional parameter. Later in the logic you can check if the parameter has the default value (say null) and that means it was not passed by the caller. To call these stored procedure from the client you can use ADO's Command object with or without Parameters. For example you could call the aboove stored procedure as

    cmd.CommandText = "MyStoredProcedure"
    cmd.CommandType = adCmdStoredProc
    cmd.Parameters.Append cmd.CreateParameter("@second", adInteger, adParamInput)
    cmd.Parameters("param1") = Whatever

    cmd.Execute

This way you have passed only second parameter. You can also call this in this way ...

    cmd.CommandText = "exec MyStoredProcedure @second = " & Whatever

    cmd.Execute
knottydrdAuthor Commented:
Thanks!  Let me review and try this out, I'll post as to how it goes.
Anthony PerkinsCommented:
Also, when you get a chance please maintain yur old open questions:

1 09/02/2003 250 Email a "Fillable" PDF  Open JavaScript
2 08/07/2003 125 Unable to open registry key  Open Active Server Pages (ASP)
3 09/14/2003 250 NVidia Video Card only 16 colors  Open Windows ME
4 10/02/2003 500 Implicit conversion from data type varch...  Open Microsoft SQL Server

Thanks,
Anthony
namasi_navaretnamCommented:
Within your stored proc you write an update statement using case. This way you have single proc to update you table.

Let say for example  @col1, col2 are input parameters. (col1 is varchar, col2 is integer)

update YourTable
set col1 = CASE WHEN (@col1 IS NULL or @col1 = '') THEN col1 ELSE @col1 END,
    col2 = CASE WHEN (@col2 IS NULL) THEN col2 ELSE @col2 END
where pk_id = @pk_id


My Example that works,

declare @job_desc varchar(100),
        @min_lvl integer

select @job_desc = 'TEST', @min_lvl = 10

update Jobs
set job_desc = CASE WHEN (@job_desc IS NULL or @job_desc = '') THEN Job_Desc ELSE @Job_DESC END,
    min_lvl = CASE WHEN (@min_lvl IS NULL) THEN min_lvl ELSE @min_lvl END
where job_id = 1


HTH

Namasi Navaretnam
namasi_navaretnamCommented:
Would you need further help? If not, please close this issue. :)

Regards.
knottydrdAuthor Commented:
Ok.  I'll close it today.
knottydrdAuthor Commented:
I'm splitting the points because this project was scuttled and I never got a chance to fully implement these solutions.  I am picking the "right" answer based upon tests that I did at the time of this post.
knottydrdAuthor Commented:
Amit_g's original answer turned out to be the best solution.  It is best to make the dynamic SQL statement in your ASP code, but in this particular application, I was extending functionality of an established app.  This app made strict use of keeping queries in Stored Procedures and not ASP.  I felt that it was best to continue this with the extension that I was working on.

Thanks all for the comments.
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Microsoft SQL Server

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.