This course teaches how to install and configure Windows Server 2012 R2. It is the first step on your path to becoming a Microsoft Certified Solutions Expert (MCSE).

A diamon's price is ratio to square of its mass(not sure if it true in reality). If the diamon was cut to 3 smaller diamonds the ratio remain the same. Is the owner got more money or less , if he sold the diamond as a big one or cut it to three smaller ones?If it it true, that he will lost money if cut the diamond by three smaller one, in which case, the money lost it most?

A little suggestion: In my opinion, it is a lot easier for one to read and understand other's solutions if all of us use same variables refer to the same problem. So if you thing my suggestion is not violate your "free of choice" please use the following:

Let M be the mass of the big diamond, and a, b and c be the masses of the 3 smallers one after cut.

Let P be the price of M and x,y,z be prices of a, b, c respectively.

Then what was given is:

P/M^2 = x/a^2 = y/b^2 = z/c^2

find if: P > x + y + z *

and if * is true, find Max(P - (x + y + z) )

Please have fun.

A little suggestion: In my opinion, it is a lot easier for one to read and understand other's solutions if all of us use same variables refer to the same problem. So if you thing my suggestion is not violate your "free of choice" please use the following:

Let M be the mass of the big diamond, and a, b and c be the masses of the 3 smallers one after cut.

Let P be the price of M and x,y,z be prices of a, b, c respectively.

Then what was given is:

P/M^2 = x/a^2 = y/b^2 = z/c^2

find if: P > x + y + z *

and if * is true, find Max(P - (x + y + z) )

Please have fun.

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Enjoy your complimentary solution view.

Get every solution instantly with premium.
Start your 7-day free trial.

I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

is( m squared) more than 3 times ((m/3) squared)?

By my old algebra I get:

m squared minus three (m/3) squared = 2/3 m squared

That means m squared will always exceed the other by a factor of 2/3 m squared.

The problem reduces to finding (if E is the price difference)

Max E = M² -(a² + b² + c²)

subject to a + b + c = M. Equivalently as a Lagrange multiplier this is

Max E = M² -(a² + b² + c²) + L(M-a-b-c)

the Max/Mins are given by dE/da = dE/db = dE/db = dE/dL =0

ie -2a-L=0 -2b-L=0 -2c-L=0 M-a-b-c=0

these have solution a=b=c=M/3 L=-2M/3 (clearly this function only has 1 turning point and is a Max)

Hence worsst split is a=b=c=M/3

As I said there is probably a prettier way and I will look later.

GfW

if a^2 = b

then (a+1)^2 = b +(2a+1)

and (a-1)^2 = b -(2a-1)

thus increasing the size of a diamond will allways give more 'gain' than an equal reduction of the size of an same-sized or smaller diamond will give 'loss'.

re "not sure if it true in reality" > not true, if it were the profession of 'diamondcutter' would not exist.

partly true in the early stages of gathering where the whethered matte surface of the raw diamonds make it hard to inspect then for color and other 'wonderfull flaws' :-))

regards JakobA

E = M² - (a² + b² + c²)

= -2M²/3 -( a² + b² + c²) + 2M² - M²/3

= 2M²/3 - (a² + b² + c²) + 2M(a + b + c) - 3M²/9

= 2M²/3 - (a-M/3)²- (b-M/3)² - (c-M/3)²

Max clearly occuring at a = b= c= m/3

E = M² - (a² + b² + c²)

= M²/3 - (a-M/3)² - (b-M/3)² - (c-M/3)²

Max occuring at a = b = c = M/3

E = (a+b+c)² - (a² + b² + c²)

= M² - (a² + b² + c²)

= 2M²/3 -(a² + b² + c²) + M²/3

= 2M²/3 - (a² + b² + c²) + 2M²/3 - M²/3

= 2M²/3 - (a² + b² + c²) + 2M/3(a + b + c) - 3M²/9

= 2M²/3 - (a-M/3)²- (b-M/3)² - (c-M/3)²

with Max of 2M²/3 occuring at a = b = c = M/3

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trialthank for participating

I dont get why you have E = M^2 - (a^2+b^2+c^2)While M and a, b, c are masses(unit karat in diamond business, may be called ounce in science) and E, unit should be dollars ($) Please read the post again. And please show all the steps

I dont know why you all ignore the variable P (which is the value of the diamond before cut).

By the way how do you write the square sign like that( not a^2). Did you write from a word document then paste into this?Or can you write directly

To JacobA. And it should be the variable use to compute the money lost too.

I think it true, JacobA. I just remember the story "It good to be Michel Duglas and Catherin Zethazon (something like that : ))) he bought for her 10 karats diamond for they weeding for $200,000 , I knew that a 2karats_diamond now cost about $5,000. So the bigger the rock, the more valueble it get???

Since price is k*mass² then price of large diamond is P = kM² = k(a+b+c)² and the prices of the smaller are ka², kb², and kc² then the problem is to find

Max E = kM² - (ka² + kb² + kc²)

which is equivalent to finding (since k is +ve)

Max ( M² - (a² + b² + c²) )

which I have show above (using M=a + b +c )

Max ( M² - (a² + b² + c²) ) = Max ( 2M²/3 - (a-M/3)² - (b-M/3)² - (c-M/3)² )

and clearly occurs at a = b = c = M/3

price of large P = kM²

price othe 3 smaller diamonds at weight M/3 each is

3*k(M/3)² = kM²/3 = P/3

hence the difference is P - P/3 = 2P/3

Max E = kM² - (ka² + kb² + kc²)

= k( M² - (a² + b² + c²) )

= k( 2M²/3 - (a-M/3)² - (b-M/3)² - (c-M/3)² )

Max occuring at a = b = c = M/3

with max being 2kM²/3 = 2P/3

However, in my work, the different between P and (x+Y=y+z)

is: P - (x+y+z)= 2P(ab+bc+ca)/M^2.

I did not see any wrong in your work. So you got the points

Math / Science

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Enjoy your complimentary solution view.

Get every solution instantly with premium.
Start your 7-day free trial.

If M=9 and a=3, b=3, c=3 and if we assume the constant P/M^2 to be 1, then P=81 and x=y=z=9 and 81 > 27.

Changing to a=4 and b=2, results in x=16 and y=4. So the increase of a leads to a bigger increase of x (+7) than the decrease of y (-5) caused by the decrease of b.

Hence the price difference is maximized when a=b=c. Because of the squaring, every little increase of one of the weights leads to a bigger increase in price than the decrease in price of the diamond that becomes smaller.

I tried to prove it with the formulas, but I'm stuck at proving that the Max(ab+ac+bc) with M=a+b+c is at a=b=c...