Solved

static routes in every router,for evey subnet???

Posted on 2003-11-10
4
386 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-17
I have a small LAN with a DSL router and a T1 router on it.The T1 is a point to point to a another LAN.I'm not using RIP on anything.Data flow works fine all around except from the remote LAN through the DSL router.When doing a TRACERT to an internet address (any) the trace dies in my WAN network.WAN subnet reports desination unreachable.Do I need a default route built in my WAN subnet pointing to my DSL router to get out on the net?I can get to the internal HTML server inside the DSL router from the remote LAN,but just can't make it through it.This is my example  http://www.citlink.net/~toddg/network/network.jpg

thanks a million
0
Comment
Question by:pbxphoneman
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 79

Expert Comment

by:lrmoore
ID: 9719441
Yes, your T1 router should have a default route pointing to the DSL router..192.168.254.254
Your remote T1 router should have a default route pointing to the WAN interface of the T1 router - 192.168.3.1
The DSL router also needs a specific route back to the 192.168.1.x subnet, pointing to the T1 router, 192.168.254.100
0
 

Author Comment

by:pbxphoneman
ID: 9721695
when you say the T1 router are you referring to the remote T1 with a static route to the dsl router?
  0.0.0.0 , 0.0.0.0 ,192.168.254.254  ???
 I have this right now
0.0.0.0 ,0.0.0.0,192.168.254.0  which gets me to the 192.168.254.0 network just fine but not the internet.maybethis is a problem.


thanks for yourtime

0
 
LVL 79

Accepted Solution

by:
lrmoore earned 250 total points
ID: 9721855
Local T1 router - 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.254.254  - points to DSL router
Remote T1 router - 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.3.1 - points to Local T1 router
DSL router - 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.254.100

0
 

Author Comment

by:pbxphoneman
ID: 9796405
the subnet between the two T1 routers (192.168.3.0) has rip turned off,will this effect the ability of the two routers "knowing" each other...thus the need to statically route to this small subnet? would there be any need to use (in the remote router) a static entry to the DSL router of 192.168.254.254 ,255.255.255.255  ( I'm new to this subnet mask usage)

thanks again....getting close
0

Featured Post

Enroll in May's Course of the Month

May’s Course of the Month is now available! Experts Exchange’s Premium Members and Team Accounts have access to a complimentary course each month as part of their membership—an extra way to increase training and boost professional development.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In this tutorial I will show you with short command examples how to obtain a packet footprint of all traffic flowing thru your Juniper device running ScreenOS. I do not know the exact firmware requirement, but I think the fprofile command is availab…
Quality of Service (QoS) options are nearly endless when it comes to networks today. This article is merely one example of how it can be handled in a hub-n-spoke design using a 3-tier configuration.
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…

751 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question