• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 620
  • Last Modified:

Migrating from Mac filerserver to Win2K??

Hi everybody, I'm new here and this is my first question.
I am fairly new to the IT industry, I've been around computers all my life, just not in a professional capacity.
Anyways, my associate and I have inherited quite a mess of a network and are currently in the process of sorting it all out and migrating all the data from severa MAC based servers to Win2K servers.
The office is about 20% Mac users and the rest Windows, however the fileserver is currently Mac-based. when doing some Mac->PC migrations I've run into some problems invoving mac-based file and directory syntax that is unrecognizeable to WinXP. In these cases so far I've literally gone in by hand and renamed,moved and copied files into directories and conventions that were Win compliant. However, when it comes time to migrate all the data from the fileserver over to the new Win-based server, this will not be a viable solution as there are gigs and gigs of data.
Do any of you know of or implement any solutions that make this migration from mac to PC simpler?

Thanks from a noob.
jack
0
Blisster
Asked:
Blisster
  • 9
  • 6
  • 3
  • +1
2 Solutions
 
ridCommented:
This may not be very helpful but...
I was in a similar situation at one point in time. The solution then was to use windows NT4 and let the mac users put their data on an UAM volume and windows users on conventional shares. After some time we got a small storage unit, a Quantum SNAP server, which handled all sorts of files without a problem. Windows XP is not the universal solution I suppose Microsoft wants us to believe it is... Perhaps you'd be better of setting up a Mac OS X server for all.

Cheers
/RID
0
 
PsiCopCommented:
Honestly, instead of migrating to Windows try NetWare v6.5. Heresy, I know, but hear me out.

With Native File Access Protocol (NFAP), the NetWare server looks like a Mac server to the Mac clients and a Windows server to the Windows clients. Novell has always done a better job than Microsoft in supporting Macs, and always will, since Novell isn't interested in replacing their desktops with their own desktop OS, just supporting the Mac.

No, you don't need special Novell client software - that's what NFAP is all about.

No, you don't need IPX. NetWare hasn't needed IPX for over 5 YEARS.

NetWare scales better than Windows server, costs less to implement (lower hardware requirements means less up-front investment) and less to own (more reliable, less downtime, invulnerable to most malware - all those things reduce cost of ownership). Its got a mature, reliable directory service and an excellent track record for delivering reliable, stable networks with long uptimes.

http://www.novell.com/netware
0
 
PsiCopCommented:
And no, I don't work for them, I'm just a very happy customer who's been responsible for a 800 node network that was about 40% Mac and 60% PC, and NetWare did a good job of providing an environment that BOTH platforms liked and could share.
0
Ultimate Tool Kit for Technology Solution Provider

Broken down into practical pointers and step-by-step instructions, the IT Service Excellence Tool Kit delivers expert advice for technology solution providers. Get your free copy now.

 
ShineOnCommented:
Mac uses two parts to each file designation: the data fork and the resource fork.

Mac is also little-endian vs big-endian in its byte-order.  (or is it the other way around?  I forget...)

Something must be used to translate between the two.  I don't know how well Windows has or does translate Mac to Win/PC file mode.  I do know that if you use the Apple utilities for PC compatibility you will be much more successful translating files to PC structure than if you rely on Microsoft.

For a much more vendor-neutral option, you could consider NetWare 6.5 with the NFAP utility.  It allows native file-access to the same data from Mac, Windows or Unix/Linux/*nix.
0
 
PsiCopCommented:
Didn't I just say that, ShineOn? :-)
0
 
ShineOnCommented:
I guess so.  Look at the timestamps.  I was probably typing mine at the time you hit "submit."
0
 
ShineOnCommented:
Unfortunately, there IS a lag.  We have to deal with it.

Not trying to step on your toes, PsiCop.  You hit enter first...
0
 
ShineOnCommented:
And... if you reread yours, and reread mine, and assume that neither was in the thread at the time they were being typed...  I did provide a tad different information than you did...
0
 
PsiCopCommented:
Chill, ShineOn, I was just tweaking your nose. :-)
0
 
ShineOnCommented:
No probs. :-)  No offense taken, none meant...
0
 
PsiCopCommented:
Next time I'll just say "I'm invisible" and you'll know I'm joking. :-)
0
 
ShineOnCommented:
hehe.,,

Take a gander at http://www.experts-exchange.com/Networking/Q_20794994.html#9734506 and let me know if you think I'm all wet... ;)
0
 
BlissterAuthor Commented:
Well, it's not really in my hands and I know that Netware is not an option, we already have the servers on site and prepped and nearly ready to deploy. This is one of the major hitches that we are waiting on. In all reality 90% of the data is old and redundant and not even needed, however the "powers that be" *insist* that we migrate all the data, period.

Thanks for the suggestions though.

Jack
0
 
BlissterAuthor Commented:
Rid-

Did using the UAM volume (and I assume the 'Services for Mac' service) force Mac users to stick with Windows-friendly naming and directory-structure conventions? Or did it do the translations itself?
I ask because the issue here is that there are gigs of data that already exists with funky Mac-style directory structures and naming syntax, and I need to migrate this data over to the Win2K server.

Thanks
jack
0
 
ShineOnCommented:
It established a true MAC namespace.  Whatever it was named in the Apple environment is what it got, and the data fork/resource fork was dynamically established for file type.

Too bad you got railroaded here.  You ended up with an "It Might Usually Work" solution as opposed to a "Best Of Breed" solution.

Now that Mac is based on FreeBSD and NetWare is soon to be based on Linux, that's yet another strike against the "wisdom" of the Powers That Be and the validity of their decisions.

C'est la vie.  

Whatever.

"I Feel Your Pain."
0
 
ridCommented:
As ShineOn said, it worked tranparently; no need for naming style adjustments. And, yes, Services for Mac enabled.
/RID
0
 
ShineOnCommented:
Just wondering - how whiny are your Mac users during all of this?  Sure, it may seem to be a good business decision to consolidate on a "cheaper" platform, but if 20% of your users are/were MAC users, they were probably doing things that Mac is good at, like publishing or advertising or doing page layouts or graphics image manipulation.  Things that Windows is STILL playing catch-up on.

Do you really WANT one-in-five users PO'd at you because you are forcing them to work harder just so you don't have to?
0
 
ShineOnCommented:
What would make a migration easier from a user perspective would be if Windows could emulate Mac.  I'm not aware of anything that makes Windows emulate Mac.  Mac can emulate Windows, however.  

Another "Hmmmm...." item to chew on as your former Mac users swear at you behind your back.
0
 
PsiCopCommented:
Sorry to hear that TPTB have closed their minds to what quite probably is the better solution. Like ShineOn, I feel your pain. Sucks to be you, I guess. Hope things get better, but if you're moving to a Windoze server environment, I wouldn't hold my breath.
0
 
BlissterAuthor Commented:
Shine-

Nobody is really peeved at the moment (besides us). We aren't actually migrating all the mac users, just servers. The design department and temps who use iMacs and such will continue. The only issue they may have will be sticking to Win-friendly naming coventions, which isn't really a problem the the savvy users here.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Improve Your Query Performance Tuning

In this FREE six-day email course, you'll learn from Janis Griffin, Database Performance Evangelist. She'll teach 12 steps that you can use to optimize your queries as much as possible and see measurable results in your work. Get started today!

  • 9
  • 6
  • 3
  • +1
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now