Solved

+-*/ evaluation

Posted on 2003-11-12
3
395 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-01
If I have:

// code
int i = 1;
float f = 1.2;
double d = 2.5;
long l = 3L;
\\ code

How will the following functions be evaluated?

// code
i * f;
d * f;
l * i;
........
\\ code

Will the variables I'm using be converted to the lowest bit-value and then calculated? Or will they be converted to the highest bit-value and the result casted to the lowest bitvalue? Or... ??? (with bitvalue I mean the amount of bits of that variable)
0
Comment
Question by:G00fy
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
3 Comments
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:drnick
ID: 9737483
that depends mainly on the compiler you use and the left-side-operats, which you omitted.
if you have f = i *f for example, the i could be converted to a float,
otherwise, having i = f * i, the f would become an int.
also, most compilers will throw warnings telling you what they do at this position or how they expect you to explicitely typecast.
0
 

Author Comment

by:G00fy
ID: 9737486
I'm using Visual C++... On linux I'm using GCC3...

it's better to static_cast<>() it then? That way I'm always sure it's what I want on any compiler?
0
 
LVL 15

Accepted Solution

by:
efn earned 50 total points
ID: 9738394
First, the compiler does the "usual unary conversions" on each operand.  That won't do anything with the types you listed, but if you had a char or short, it would be promoted to int.

Then it does the "usual binary conversions" to convert both operands to the same type.  If either one is a floating point type, both are converted to floating point.  Aside from that, if the two types have different widths, they are converted to the wider type.

So for i * f, i is converted to float; for d * f, f is converted to double; and for l * i, i is converted to long.

The result of the expression may be converted again if it is assigned to something else, but first the operands are converted as described above.  Also, the order of the operands does not matter.  Any compiler that conforms to the language standard should do it this way.

You only need to use static_cast if you need something other than the usual conversions.

--efn
0

Featured Post

Announcing the Most Valuable Experts of 2016

MVEs are more concerned with the satisfaction of those they help than with the considerable points they can earn. They are the types of people you feel privileged to call colleagues. Join us in honoring this amazing group of Experts.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In days of old, returning something by value from a function in C++ was necessarily avoided because it would, invariably, involve one or even two copies of the object being created and potentially costly calls to a copy-constructor and destructor. A…
This article will show you some of the more useful Standard Template Library (STL) algorithms through the use of working examples.  You will learn about how these algorithms fit into the STL architecture, how they work with STL containers, and why t…
The viewer will learn how to user default arguments when defining functions. This method of defining functions will be contrasted with the non-default-argument of defining functions.
The viewer will learn how to clear a vector as well as how to detect empty vectors in C++.

730 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question