• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 230
  • Last Modified:

pointer to a static function

To C++ experts,

If I have a class, and a function like :
class X{} ;
static X* fun(int*) ;

How do I declare a pointer to a function which can point to fun ?
thanks.

meow.
0
meow00
Asked:
meow00
2 Solutions
 
rstaveleyCommented:
Use of the word static for a function to prevent it from having public linkage is now deprecated (though I must confess I do it all the time). You should really use an unnamed namespace instead, if you want to prevent the function from having public linkage.

--------8<--------
#include <iostream>

class X {};

namespace {
        class X x;
        X* fun(int*)
        {
                return &x;
        }
}

int main()
{
        // Get a pointer to the function
        X* (*ptr)(int*) = fun;

        // Use it
        int myint = 123;
        X* xp = (*ptr)(&myint);
}
--------8<--------
0
 
freewellCommented:
int nData = 10;
X* (*pMyFunction)(int*);

pMyFunction = fun;
pMyFunction(&nData);
0
 
migoEXCommented:
Exactly if there was no 'static' keyword - this only means the function is accessible only from this file. Even when you declare static function inside the class, the syntax would be the same.

X* (* tFunnc)(int*);

tFunc myFunc = fun;
0
Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
meow00Author Commented:
Hi,

    Could anyone please tell me that why not use
 "(static X*)(*pMyFunction)(int*);" ? why I don't need static in the very beginning ? Thanks !

meow.
0
 
migoEXCommented:
'static' is a definition of a SCOPE of a function, not a TYPE, which is parameters and return value.

Exactly as:

class A{
   public:
   static int s_i;
};

the type of s_i is 'int' and not 'static int'
0
 
Sys_ProgCommented:
Try the following code snippet

int f () {
}
static int f () {
}


This would give u a compile error saying "redefinition of `int f()' "

This demonstrates that static is not at all related to the function signature

Now, technically, static is a type of storage class, thus it only decides what storage class the function belongs to and the behaviour of the compiler gets affected in the corresponding way

When u are declaring a pointer to a function, u just need the function signature and not the storage class of the function

That's the reason for your code to work

HTH

Amit
0
 
tinchosCommented:
No comment has been added lately, so it's time to clean up this TA.
I will leave the following recommendation for this question in the Cleanup topic area:

Split: rstaveley {http:#9737786} & migoEX {http:#9741331}

Please leave any comments here within the next seven days.
PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS COMMENT AS AN ANSWER!

Tinchos
EE Cleanup Volunteer
0

Featured Post

Concerto's Cloud Advisory Services

Want to avoid the missteps to gaining all the benefits of the cloud? Learn more about the different assessment options from our Cloud Advisory team.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now