Equivalent machine to a AMD config

i have an AMD system for buying consideration. I would like to know what Intel machine would given me similar performance if rest of the things (memory, hdd...) are kept equal.

Configuration under consideration is

Asus A7M266-D dual processor motherboard
2 AMD MP CPUs running at 1 GHz each

Motherboard info can be located at
http://usa.asus.com/products/mb/socketa/a7m266-d/overview.htm

LVL 10
kiranghagAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

jhanceCommented:
Generally, AMD and Intel machines perform about the same at the same clock speed.  Yes there are "marketing" differences where one claims this advantage and another claims that advantage...

So your specific case, a 2 CPU 1GHz setup with AMD processors will be roughly matched by a 2 CPU @ 1GHz Intel system.

This seems like a silly question.  Is there something more that you're really needing to determine?
0
kiranghagAuthor Commented:
it may seem like a silly question.
but clockspeed may not be an exact benchmark in most cases. personally i have tried AMD only when they had AMD386x in the market. after that not used an amd for anytime for a considerable period where i can judge the quoted and noted performance.
thats y the question came up. meanwhile they had different arguments in the print/news about the clockspeed offerred and equivalent peformance (PR in case of cyrix) and i prefferred to be an intel loyalist by situation

another reason for this consideration is the deal i am planning to do.
in my country, a simple motherboard costs around 4000(INR). and a 1gig (intel) cpu will cost me around 8000 (INR) each.
considering a multiprocessor cpu to be costly, i can make it up to 7000 (INR).
so a new deal should cost me around 7000+8000+8000 = 23000 INR.
same deal is being qouted at 20000 INR for secondhand pieces.

amds are know to have lesser price than intel always here.

so i just wanted to work out which intel configuration (smae in terms of performance) i would be getting.
knowing this i would be in a good position to bargain the deal.

and yes, the marketing difference which u have mentioned also made me put this up...

thanks for your interest so far...
0
jhanceCommented:
Indeed, but YOU said:

"...if rest of the things (memory, hdd...) are kept equal."



0
Ultimate Tool Kit for Technology Solution Provider

Broken down into practical pointers and step-by-step instructions, the IT Service Excellence Tool Kit delivers expert advice for technology solution providers. Get your free copy now.

chicagoanCommented:
The complexity and cost of a dual motherboard running 2 1ghz chips surely can't be cost effective compared to a single processor running at twice that speed?

XP processors are nearly half the cost of MP processors and a motherboard that uses a single XP2500+ is going to allow DDR2700 memory to run at bus speed and will run rings around a dual 1ghz which likely will be using PC100 or 133 memory or choking DDR due to a slow CPU front-side bus. Many SMP boards also require special power supplies with additional motherboard connectors similar to some P4 motherboards and will certainly have high power supply requirements.

Benchmarks for the AMD and Intel processors have always been controversial and hovering in the same ballpark depending on whether SPEC, winstone, doom or whatever benchmark was used. In recent tests where both systems were outfitted with DDR memory, ZDNet found recently that the 2.2GHz Pentium 4 Northwood often  could not keep up with the Athlon XP 2000+.

If only an intel dual 1ghz and an AMD dual 1ghz were available, I'd probably opt for the intel only because a great many more SMP intel boards have been produced and the likely the engineering of the board is going to be more refined, although asus has a great reputation and a current product ought to be no problem.

0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
fixxit1Commented:
AMD uses a performance rating system to rate their processors. If anyone remembers that was tried originally by CYRIX way back when. The idea that raw speed does not account for real world app performance. so an AMD 1800 is actually a couple hundred cycles slower than an Intel 1800. The difference has to do with how the chip is able to process the info. Though a slower speed in cycles, a more efficient processing using real world applications.
0
guynumber5764Commented:
AMD 1800 runs at around 1.5Ghz and is roughly as fast as a P4-1.8GHz or P3-1.5GHz  (yes, P4s are slower than P3s for the same clock speed).
0
kiranghagAuthor Commented:
thanks all
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Hardware

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.