Linked-List.

To C++ experts,

    When we want to creat a linked-list, is it better to declare  the "ListNode" class and the "Itarator" class as members of the "List" class ? or better to make them separated classes with friend functions ?

    Similarly, should the "TreeNode" class and the "TreeIterator" class be members of the "Tree" class  ? or better to make them separated classes ?

Thanks.

meow.
LVL 1
meow00Asked:
Who is Participating?
 
tinchosCommented:
Hi meow00,

If the Iterator class is going to be used only to iterate the List class, I would create it as Inner classes of the List class, as it's existence is limitated only to that class.

I would definitely create the ListNode class as an Inner class of List, as like the case before it's existence is limitated to the List class (ListNodes will only be part of a List, they won't work with other classes).


Example with both classes as inner classes

public class List
{
    public class ListNode
    {
        // Code
    };
    public class Iterator
    {
        // Code
    };
}



Hope this helps
0
 
DexstarCommented:
meow00:

>     When we want to creat a linked-list, is it better to declare  the "ListNode"
> class and the "Itarator" class as members of the "List" class ? or better to
> make them separated classes with friend functions ?

You should study the Standard Template Library, and see how they do it in there.  If you want to be good at C++, it behooves you to learn the STL.  It is very handy.

Hope That Helps,
Dex*
0
 
meow00Author Commented:
Yes, but some STL books have Iterator class and ListNode class inside the List class. However, others prefer to make them different classes. I am sure both ways work, but I don't know which method is better in different situations ....... thanks .....
0
 
DexstarCommented:
Both classes should be derived internally to the list class.  That way, other classes only need to know about the list, and they automatically get access to the node classes (if needed), and to the iterator classes via the typedefs or definitions of the class.  For example:
    List::iterator itr = l.begin();

Anything knowing about List, automatically knows about List::iterator.  If they were separate, this would not be guarenteed.

Dex*
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.