From Name not displaying properly

When we send an email to a client who is using Lotus Notes from e.g.

contact-bob-smith@domain.com (Bob Smith)

Instead of displaying "Bob Smith" in the From field, it displays: 'contact' or 'contact-bob-smith', basically the starting part of the email address, completely ignoring the From Name.

The email is being sent of a Linux Box using sendmail.

In all other email readers / hotmail / yahoo / etc, the From name displays correctly.

Is this a Lotus Notes configuration issue, or is there something that can be done to the MIME header / email envelope to ensure that the From name is displayed properly.
LVL 1
unobservedAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
qwaleteeConnect With a Mentor Commented:
Note: Here's the culprit code...

CN1 := @Trim(@Name([CN]; Who));

This code does a simplistic Common Name extraction, using the atomic @Name function.  That function assumes that the common name is at the start of any address, and ends at an @ sign or a < sign, and strips extra spaces or quotation marks.

"Comments" in RFC822 addresses are enclosed in parentheses.  By convention, a comment at the end of the address is considered the name.  So, while contact-bob-smith@domain.com (Bob Smith) is certainly valid as an address, the (Bob Smith) part is merely a comment that many mail programs chose to accept as representing a name.  The address above could also have been encoded as contact-bob-(Bob) smith@domain.com (Smith) -- and would have no special difference in meaning for RFC822 as compared to the representation you used.  Comments are simply ignored, and you are using a convention.

Admittedly, sincethe convention has become farily common Notes shoudl support it.  But @Name does not recognize that format, and trims contact-bob-smith@domain.com (Bob Smith) down to the part before the @ -- contact-bob-smith

If the atomic function were changed (binary code core to the platform), that woud take care of it, but Lotus is probably reluctant to introduce a possible regression issue or programmers who have used that code elsewhere.  They could put in a new token, @Name([RFC822CN];...), but I guess not.  The parsing code could work around it, but I don't think you are going to change your client's mailbox design.  The following change to that line would do it:

rf822name := @Left(@Right(@Right(who; "@"); "("); ")");
CN1 := @Trim(@Name([CN]; @If(rfc822name = ""; Who; RFC822name)));

0
 
qwaleteeCommented:
Limitation of the design of the Notes mailbox template -- it doesn't properly parse that format.

Instead, use:

Bob Smith <contact-bob-smith@domain.com>
0
 
David777Commented:
in note5 you can use the parameter of @name to get rfc822 address, that's [phrase]. e.g
contact-bob-smith@domain.com (Bob Smith)
you will get "bob smith"
@name([phrase];address)
you may put this to input translation of from field for display.

0
The 14th Annual Expert Award Winners

The results are in! Meet the top members of our 2017 Expert Awards. Congratulations to all who qualified!

 
qwaleteeCommented:
David777,
Not so.  It only returns a phrase taht becomes before <user@domain>, such as I suggested above, at least under R5.

And the pont woudl be moot because the mail file uses view/folder columns that are programmed without that code.
0
 
qwaleteeCommented:
unobserved,
Did you change your addressing style?
0
 
unobservedAuthor Commented:
Yup, working fine now.

Thank you.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.