From Name not displaying properly

When we send an email to a client who is using Lotus Notes from e.g.

contact-bob-smith@domain.com (Bob Smith)

Instead of displaying "Bob Smith" in the From field, it displays: 'contact' or 'contact-bob-smith', basically the starting part of the email address, completely ignoring the From Name.

The email is being sent of a Linux Box using sendmail.

In all other email readers / hotmail / yahoo / etc, the From name displays correctly.

Is this a Lotus Notes configuration issue, or is there something that can be done to the MIME header / email envelope to ensure that the From name is displayed properly.
LVL 1
unobservedAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

qwaleteeCommented:
Limitation of the design of the Notes mailbox template -- it doesn't properly parse that format.

Instead, use:

Bob Smith <contact-bob-smith@domain.com>
0
qwaleteeCommented:
Note: Here's the culprit code...

CN1 := @Trim(@Name([CN]; Who));

This code does a simplistic Common Name extraction, using the atomic @Name function.  That function assumes that the common name is at the start of any address, and ends at an @ sign or a < sign, and strips extra spaces or quotation marks.

"Comments" in RFC822 addresses are enclosed in parentheses.  By convention, a comment at the end of the address is considered the name.  So, while contact-bob-smith@domain.com (Bob Smith) is certainly valid as an address, the (Bob Smith) part is merely a comment that many mail programs chose to accept as representing a name.  The address above could also have been encoded as contact-bob-(Bob) smith@domain.com (Smith) -- and would have no special difference in meaning for RFC822 as compared to the representation you used.  Comments are simply ignored, and you are using a convention.

Admittedly, sincethe convention has become farily common Notes shoudl support it.  But @Name does not recognize that format, and trims contact-bob-smith@domain.com (Bob Smith) down to the part before the @ -- contact-bob-smith

If the atomic function were changed (binary code core to the platform), that woud take care of it, but Lotus is probably reluctant to introduce a possible regression issue or programmers who have used that code elsewhere.  They could put in a new token, @Name([RFC822CN];...), but I guess not.  The parsing code could work around it, but I don't think you are going to change your client's mailbox design.  The following change to that line would do it:

rf822name := @Left(@Right(@Right(who; "@"); "("); ")");
CN1 := @Trim(@Name([CN]; @If(rfc822name = ""; Who; RFC822name)));

0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
David777Commented:
in note5 you can use the parameter of @name to get rfc822 address, that's [phrase]. e.g
contact-bob-smith@domain.com (Bob Smith)
you will get "bob smith"
@name([phrase];address)
you may put this to input translation of from field for display.

0
Build an E-Commerce Site with Angular 5

Learn how to build an E-Commerce site with Angular 5, a JavaScript framework used by developers to build web, desktop, and mobile applications.

qwaleteeCommented:
David777,
Not so.  It only returns a phrase taht becomes before <user@domain>, such as I suggested above, at least under R5.

And the pont woudl be moot because the mail file uses view/folder columns that are programmed without that code.
0
qwaleteeCommented:
unobserved,
Did you change your addressing style?
0
unobservedAuthor Commented:
Yup, working fine now.

Thank you.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Lotus IBM

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.