Objects

1) Do member functions occupy space in objects?
LeelaSwamyAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

AlexFMCommented:
Only if they are virtual.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
jhshuklaCommented:
when you compile a program, a "symbol table" is created that has information for each datatype used in the program, including basic types. (int, char ...) the information for global functions and member functions of classes is also stored in the same table for later use.

functions are part of the class not the variable. same thing with static members of the class except for one difference. static members can be accessed without actually creating an object but non-static functions have to be called using concrete objects.

so the answer is NO.
0
jhshuklaCommented:
yes, and only if they are virtual.
0
MirkoLMVCommented:
The answer is not simple, because the question is not simple.
There is no consensus on objects implementation in C++, just common aspects and more or less differences between various compilers. However, we can consider that intimate details of relevance for C++ programmers are common to the most implementations, and the differences are important just for the restraint circles of compiler developers. (Compiler development is a quite definite specialty in programing).
The code of a member function  appears just in a single place in a program, related to the class object (the object which is employed by the program as a template for creating instance objects of the class). Each instance object has access to the same piece of code, and the this pointer has some importance in this mechanism. It is suggested a very limited space expense for each instance object, regardless of the number of member functions.
For virtual member functions there is also no code duplication at all. There is a virtual methods table (VMT or vtable) within the class objects, and every instance object has just a special pointer (vpointer) to the virtual methods table.

Good luck !
0
tinchosCommented:
No comment has been added lately, so it's time to clean up this TA.
I will leave the following recommendation for this question in the Cleanup topic area:

Accept: AlexFM {http:#9770363}

Please leave any comments here within the next seven days.
PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS COMMENT AS AN ANSWER!

Tinchos
EE Cleanup Volunteer
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
C++

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.