Solved

Windows 2003 Terminal Services vs. Citrix

Posted on 2003-11-20
4
1,530 Views
Last Modified: 2010-08-05
We currently have Citrix Metaframe 1.8 running on Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Server.  We are going to be upgrading to Windows Server 2003 shortly and need to decide whether or not to use Citrix or native Windows Terminal Services.  We will be using thin clients for users to access their applications.

Does anyone have information on the quality of Windows Server 2003 Terminal Services?  Is it better than Citrix?  Are we able to publish applications only to users or do they need to have an entire work environment?

Any help will be appreciated.
0
Comment
Question by:Jeremy1029
  • 2
4 Comments
 

Accepted Solution

by:
zhihong78 earned 250 total points
ID: 9787891
If you only use Windows Server 2003 Terminal Services, you are not able to publish application (not entire desktop). Publish Application will only possible when you are using Citrix. Citrix is enhancing existing Windows Terminal Services, without WTS, Citrix would not run.

But, Citrix ICA technologies have better performance on screen latency, and you could load-balance 1 published application across multiple servers (depends which version you are chooing). And widely support of clients range, from DOS, Linux, Java Browser, UNIX...etc which WTS only runs on Windows clients.

If you are looking for small environment, WTS will do. If you are looking for large environment (our company has 200 users based with 5 Citrix Servers), Citrix is much more powerful and easier to administer.
0
 

Expert Comment

by:euroluce
ID: 9792843
zhihong78 states that "WTS only runs on Windows clients"

This is incorrect. I regularly connect to WTS Server using a Mac client, and have done testing using Linux clients. The Mac clients are supplied by Microsoft (the Remote Desktop client) and the Linux clients are standard on the Redhat 9 workstation clients I was testing.

Using rdesktop to access terminal services running on Win 2K server was working very well for me - fairly cheap way to deploy clients IMHO.
0
 

Expert Comment

by:zhihong78
ID: 9801702
Thanks for your information euroluce, when I read the Terminal Services book, the book did not mentioned about Mac client and Linux is totally out of my way especially Redhat 9, which I haven't test out. Thanks!
0
 

Expert Comment

by:jcjohnson
ID: 10073419
Jeremy,
Vector ESP is the #1 Citrix reseller as well as largest independent Microsoft Gold Partner in the country.  This question is posed to us daily, and we have a number of resources to help you understand exactly the benefits of Citrix vs. TS with and w/o AD.

Give me a call and we can discuss: (972) 774-0775 x18
Chris Johnson
0

Featured Post

Secure Your Active Directory - April 20, 2017

Active Directory plays a critical role in your company’s IT infrastructure and keeping it secure in today’s hacker-infested world is a must.
Microsoft published 300+ pages of guidance, but who has the time, money, and resources to implement? Register now to find an easier way.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

NTFS file system has been developed by Microsoft that is widely used by Windows NT operating system and its advanced versions. It is the mostly used over FAT file system as it provides superior features like reliability, security, storage, efficienc…
Enabling the Skype for Business Meeting Scheduler in Hybrid OWA
The Email Laundry PDF encryption service allows companies to send confidential encrypted  emails to anybody. The PDF document can also contain attachments that are embedded in the encrypted PDF. The password is randomly generated by The Email Laundr…

713 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question