Solved

bubble sort program

Posted on 2003-11-23
8
26,658 Views
Last Modified: 2011-08-18
I wrote a program  in (a86 )to sort the whole array into ascending order and it’s run ok but how can I make it more effcient(reducing unnecessary work) this is my code;


Code segment
      Jmp  main
      Add1 dw 9,3,2,7,1,4,2,5,8,1

Main:      mov si,0
      call order
      mov si,0
      call order
      mov si,0
      call order
      mov si,0
      call order
      mov si,0
      call order
      mov si,0
      call order
      mov si,0
      call order
      mov si,0
      call order
      ret

order:      call orderab
      call orderab
      call orderab
      call orderab
      call orderab
      call orderab
      call orderab
      call orderab
      call orderab
      
orderab:      mov ax,add1[si]
      cmp ax,add1[si+2]
      jli finish
      mov bx,add1[si+2]
      mov add1[si],bx
      mov add1[si+2],ax
finish:      inc si
      inc si
      ret
0
Comment
Question by:alqaoud
8 Comments
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:terageek
ID: 9820549
Each time you call order, you need to call orderab 1 fewer time.  In addition, you could put orderab inline.  I left main unrolloed since it is still called a constant number of times.  Also, since you have dwords, shouldn't your indexes go by 4?

Code segment
     Jmp  main
     Add1 dw 9,3,2,7,1,4,2,5,8,1

Main:     mov cx, 9
     call order
     mov cx, 8
     call order
     mov cx, 7
     call order
     mov cx, 6
     call order
     mov cx, 5
     call order
     mov cx, 4
     call order
     mov cx, 3
     call order
     mov cx, 2
     call order
     mov cx, 1
     call order
     ret

order:     xor si, si
orderab:     mov ax,add1[si]
     cmp ax,add1[si+4]
     jle finish
     mov bx,add1[si+4]
     mov add1[si],bx
     mov add1[si+4],ax
finish:     add si, 4
     loop orderab
     ret

This will reduce the work almost in half, but add some overhad from the loop.  If you are concerned about average run-time, you could do the following.  It will run very quickly if the list is already in order (just 9 compares!), but slower than the above code if it is in reverse order (same number of compares, with more overhead).

Main:  mov cx, 9
order:     xor si, si
     mov di, cx
     xor dx, dx
orderab:
     mov ax,add1[si]
     cmp ax,add1[si+4]
     jle finish
     mov dx, di
     sub dx, ci
     mov bx,add1[si+4]
     mov add1[si],bx
     mov add1[si+4],ax
finish:     add si, 4
     loop orderab
     inc dx
     mov cx, dx
     loop order
     ret
0
 

Author Comment

by:alqaoud
ID: 9821949
terageek, thank you very much but you first program give this result 2,3,1,7,2,4,8,5,9,1 and the second program didn't excute correctly and the the result i need should be 1,1,2,2,3,4,5,7,8,9 like the result from my program i wrote in beginning.
0
 
LVL 3

Accepted Solution

by:
terageek earned 50 total points
ID: 9822072
Hmmm....

If your code worked correctly, you can try changing my 4s to 2s.

I just saw a typo in the second code...

     sub dx, ci
should be:
     sub dx, cx
0
Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

 

Expert Comment

by:tkcan30
ID: 10136562
The best way to make the sort more efficient is to use a different algorithm such as quicksort, heapsort, or mergesort.  Those types of sorts require  n* log n comparisons on average, while a sort such as bubble sort requires n*n comparisons.  These algorithms are a lot faster, especially for arrays larger than 300 or so.  For some examples of other algorithms and source code, try http://www.cs.ubc.ca/spider/harrison/Java/sorting-demo.html.
0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:terageek
ID: 10150426
Actually, an optimized bubble-sort will require only n comparisons on an array which is already sorted.  Quicksort, heapsort, mergesort and insertionsort all take n*log n.  If your data set is already mostly sorted, bubble-sort will give you the best average runtime.
0
 

Expert Comment

by:SOBKing
ID: 10465516
if the list is sorted and all you are trying to do is insert an element you dont need anywhere near n comparisons, you will only need log n

each comparison you are chopping the list in 1/2
0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:terageek
ID: 10474109
Sorting a list and inserting an element into a sorted list are two different problems.

There are a few algorithms for inserting a new element into a sorted list.  There is a binary search insertion which requires log (n) compares, and there is a linear search insertion which can take from 1 to n compares.  If your data is in a linked list or you can start off taking a guess as to about where a piece of data should go, the linear search can be faster on average.

Dispite the big-O analysis, sometimes a generally "slower" algorithm can be faster when you take into account your specific data-set.
0

Featured Post

Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

This article lists the top 5 free OST to PST Converter Tools. These tools save a lot of time for users when they want to convert OST to PST after their exchange server is no longer available or some other critical issue with exchange server or impor…
There are many Password Managers (PM) out there to choose from. PM's can help with your password habits and routines, but they should not be a crutch you rely on too heavily. I also have an article for company/enterprise PM's.
This video shows how to remove a single email address from the Outlook 2010 Auto Suggestion memory. NOTE: For Outlook 2016 and 2013 perform the exact same steps. Open a new email: Click the New email button in Outlook. Start typing the address: …
With Secure Portal Encryption, the recipient is sent a link to their email address directing them to the email laundry delivery page. From there, the recipient will be required to enter a user name and password to enter the page. Once the recipient …

914 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

16 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now