Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

NBAR + Policy Routing?

Posted on 2003-11-24
1
Medium Priority
?
437 Views
Last Modified: 2008-01-16
Here's the scenario:

A site in <faraway country> is connected to our headquarters via frame relay, and is supposed to use our Internet access due to the security requirements of having a full-blown DMZ, content blocking system, etc.  These standards are non-negotiable and would cost far too much to deploy at this remote location.  However, they have a few business-related sites (banks, mainly) that are located in the same country that they need to access regularly.  Since Internet traffic is currently going across the ocean several times, it's causing their sessions to time out, which is obviously not good.
 
So, given a (NAT-ed) link to a local ISP (on an interface running IOS firewall and generally locked down as much as possible, it seems that I have two options:

1. Figure out all the IPs/subnets involved with the bank sites and statically route them out the local ISP port.
2. Use NBAR to identify the relevant traffic and policy route it out the local ISP port.

Option 1 is obviously simpler in a way, but seems like it could end up being a hassle and possibly be hard to maintain since the banks are under no obligation to keep their IPs static.  So my question is, how feasible would Option 2 be?  I've worked with policy routing before, but not for this kind of problem, and I've never used NBAR at all.  Besides the "can this work" question, I'm wondering how badly this is going to kill a low-to-mid-range router to do the extra work involved.
0
Comment
Question by:MaxQ
1 Comment
 
LVL 18

Accepted Solution

by:
chicagoan earned 1500 total points
ID: 9812891
I think option 1 is reasonable, large institutions rarely change netblocks, though this doesn't protect you alone, there's no guarantee they don't have problems, but combined with PAT, sensible filters (IOS firewall features?) and syslog inspection, ought to be adequate and defensible in terms of due dilligence.

while NBAR is supported on 1700's and up last i looked, it seems like overkill here and I believe will be a lot more labor if you don't need traffic shaping, etc. whether it would be a drag on resources depends on the policies and traffic. On a 3600 and a T1 you'd probably be OK
0

Featured Post

Configuration Guide and Best Practices

Read the guide to learn how to orchestrate Data ONTAP, create application-consistent backups and enable fast recovery from NetApp storage snapshots. Version 9.5 also contains performance and scalability enhancements to meet the needs of the largest enterprise environments.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Unable to change the program that handles the scan event from a network attached Canon/Brother printer/scanner. This means you'll always have to choose which program handles this action, e.g. ControlCenter4 (in the case of a Brother).
This article will show you step-by-step instructions to build your own NTP CentOS server.  The network diagram shows the best practice to setup the NTP server farm for redundancy.  This article also serves as your NTP server documentation.
Monitoring a network: why having a policy is the best policy? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the enormous benefits of having a policy-based approach when monitoring medium and large networks. Software utilized in this v…
Monitoring a network: why having a policy is the best policy? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the enormous benefits of having a policy-based approach when monitoring medium and large networks. Software utilized in this v…

877 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question