?
Solved

NBAR + Policy Routing?

Posted on 2003-11-24
1
Medium Priority
?
435 Views
Last Modified: 2008-01-16
Here's the scenario:

A site in <faraway country> is connected to our headquarters via frame relay, and is supposed to use our Internet access due to the security requirements of having a full-blown DMZ, content blocking system, etc.  These standards are non-negotiable and would cost far too much to deploy at this remote location.  However, they have a few business-related sites (banks, mainly) that are located in the same country that they need to access regularly.  Since Internet traffic is currently going across the ocean several times, it's causing their sessions to time out, which is obviously not good.
 
So, given a (NAT-ed) link to a local ISP (on an interface running IOS firewall and generally locked down as much as possible, it seems that I have two options:

1. Figure out all the IPs/subnets involved with the bank sites and statically route them out the local ISP port.
2. Use NBAR to identify the relevant traffic and policy route it out the local ISP port.

Option 1 is obviously simpler in a way, but seems like it could end up being a hassle and possibly be hard to maintain since the banks are under no obligation to keep their IPs static.  So my question is, how feasible would Option 2 be?  I've worked with policy routing before, but not for this kind of problem, and I've never used NBAR at all.  Besides the "can this work" question, I'm wondering how badly this is going to kill a low-to-mid-range router to do the extra work involved.
0
Comment
Question by:MaxQ
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
1 Comment
 
LVL 18

Accepted Solution

by:
chicagoan earned 1500 total points
ID: 9812891
I think option 1 is reasonable, large institutions rarely change netblocks, though this doesn't protect you alone, there's no guarantee they don't have problems, but combined with PAT, sensible filters (IOS firewall features?) and syslog inspection, ought to be adequate and defensible in terms of due dilligence.

while NBAR is supported on 1700's and up last i looked, it seems like overkill here and I believe will be a lot more labor if you don't need traffic shaping, etc. whether it would be a drag on resources depends on the policies and traffic. On a 3600 and a T1 you'd probably be OK
0

Featured Post

Looking for a new Web Host?

Lunarpages' assortment of hosting products and solutions ensure a perfect fit for anyone looking to get their vision or products to market. Our award winning customer support and 30-day money back guarantee show the pride we take in being the industry's premier MSP.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

I had an issue with InstallShield not being able to use Computer Browser service on Windows Server 2012. Here is the solution I found.
This month, Experts Exchange’s free Course of the Month is focused on CompTIA IT Fundamentals.
There's a multitude of different network monitoring solutions out there, and you're probably wondering what makes NetCrunch so special. It's completely agentless, but does let you create an agent, if you desire. It offers powerful scalability …
In this video we outline the Physical Segments view of NetCrunch network monitor. By following this brief how-to video, you will be able to learn how NetCrunch visualizes your network, how granular is the information collected, as well as where to f…

719 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question