Want to win a PS4? Go Premium and enter to win our High-Tech Treats giveaway. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

'with' function?

Posted on 2003-11-25
6
Medium Priority
?
227 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-16
Does C# have anything similar to Visual Basic's 'with' function?
0
Comment
Question by:derekthornton
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
6 Comments
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:_TAD_
ID: 9819937


nope.


most people think that using the "using" statement is the same thing, but it is not.

0
 
LVL 22

Accepted Solution

by:
_TAD_ earned 200 total points
ID: 9819960
There are, however, a lot of other shortcuts you can use.

What code are you trying to shorten?  If you post it, we may be able to tidy it up for you.


The great thing about .Net is that many of its properties are really just references to other objects.

So instead of typing:
object1.child1.subchild2.subchild3.value1 = "something1";
object1.child1.subchild2.subchild3.value2 = "something2";
object1.child1.subchild2.subchild3.value3 = "something3";

many times you can say:

object1.child1.subchild2.subchild3 myObj;
myObj.value1 = "something1";
myObj.value2 = "something2";
myObj.value3 = "something3";
0
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:ptmcomp
ID: 9819976
No.
Why?
- It makes the code hard to read.
- Things like "myObject.MyOtherObject.TheThridObject.AIndexer[myObject.MyOtherObject.AValue].Name" are nothing but very bad programming style. So there's no reason to make it easier to do bad programming...
- Everything more than one, max. two steps away should not be accessed directly.
0
VIDEO: THE CONCERTO CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.

 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:derekthornton
ID: 9820116
I'm just trying to define the fileds of a struct, I can type them all in, it would just be easier with a 'with' like block. Thanks anyway!
0
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:ptmcomp
ID: 9820203
Define a constructor on the struct.

public struct MyStruct
{
    int a;
    int b;
    int c;

    public MyStruct(int a, int b, int c)
    {
        this.a = a;
        this.b = b;
        this.b = b;
    }
}

Then call new MyStruct(1, 2, 3);
0
 
LVL 2

Expert Comment

by:ericgu
ID: 9820537
0

Featured Post

How to Use the Help Bell

Need to boost the visibility of your question for solutions? Use the Experts Exchange Help Bell to confirm priority levels and contact subject-matter experts for question attention.  Check out this how-to article for more information.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Article by: Ivo
C# And Nullable Types Since 2.0 C# has Nullable(T) Generic Structure. The idea behind is to allow value type objects to have null values just like reference types have. This concerns scenarios where not all data sources have values (like a databa…
Exception Handling is in the core of any application that is able to dignify its name. In this article, I'll guide you through the process of writing a DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) Exception Handling mechanism, using Aspect Oriented Programming.
This tutorial will teach you the special effect of super speed similar to the fictional character Wally West aka "The Flash" After Shake : http://www.videocopilot.net/presets/after_shake/ All lightning effects with instructions : http://www.mediaf…
In this video, Percona Solutions Engineer Barrett Chambers discusses some of the basic syntax differences between MySQL and MongoDB. To learn more check out our webinar on MongoDB administration for MySQL DBA: https://www.percona.com/resources/we…

636 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question