?
Solved

Amanda Backup Server Specs

Posted on 2003-12-02
2
Medium Priority
?
434 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-04
I'm currently building an Amanda server to backup 16 hosts (the OS's:
Win2k, FBSD 5.0, OBSD 2.9-3.5, RH 8.0) which amounts to approximately
180gb of data. For backup medium, my current plan is to use 3 Dell
110T 40/80gb dlt tape drives. This is my first experience with Amanda,
and would like some input on how powerful the server should be to
handle the aformentioned workload.

After a considerable amount of research (google, Unix Backup and
Recovery, amanda.org, the amanda-users group :), etc), I've been
unable to find documentation on what kind of processor power is
necessary. I do intend to use software compression rather than
hardware compression, so I don't want to skimp on the processor.

Any input or personal experience would be greatly appreciated (links,
rtfm page x!, books)!

Thanks for the help
0
Comment
Question by:yakuza_soozo
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
2 Comments
 
LVL 18

Accepted Solution

by:
chicagoan earned 375 total points
ID: 9864371
> I do intend to use software compression rather than hardware compression
Why? The hardware compression will stream the drives as fast as you can feed it and will recoverable on any DLT.

I've fed 5 DLT's (3 7000's and 2 8000's) with a dual pentium pro 200 and dual 100BaseT NIC's on fast ether channel, it doesn't take too much.
If you're using GIGe the nic could eat some cpu clicks, but I'd thing anything in the 2Ghz class ought to be fine.
Fast disk helps the catalogue get written.
0
 

Author Comment

by:yakuza_soozo
ID: 9868682
>> I do intend to use software compression rather than hardware compression
>Why? The hardware compression will stream the drives as fast as you can feed it and will recoverable on any DLT.

By going the software compression route, AMANDA would be able to track usage and make better estimates of image sizes. I realize that the aforementioned features aren't absolutely necessary, but since this is my first experience dealing with backup systems, I figured that additional information on data/image sizes would prove to be quite valuable. If further down the road I decide that hardware compression is the way to go, a machine with a fast proc would have no problems handling it.
0

Featured Post

10 Questions to Ask when Buying Backup Software

Choosing the right backup solution for your organization can be a daunting task. To make the selection process easier, ask solution providers these 10 key questions.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Lets start to have a small explanation what is VAAI(vStorage API for Array Integration ) and what are the benefits using it. VAAI is an API framework in VMware that enable some Storage tasks. It first presented in ESXi 4.1, but only after 5.x sup…
Is your phone running out of space to hold pictures?  This article will show you quick tips on how to solve this problem.
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of installing the necessary services and then configuring a Windows Server 2012 system as an iSCSI target. To install the necessary roles, go to Server Manager, and select Add Roles and Featu…
This Micro Tutorial will teach you how to reformat your flash drive. Sometimes your flash drive may have issues carrying files so this will completely restore it to manufacturing settings. Make sure to backup all files before reformatting. This w…
Suggested Courses

800 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question