• C

setvect and getvect

I'm supposed to write my own functions of setvect and getvect with same parameters used in turbo c's setvect and getvect. I guess i should multiply intNo by 4 and pass it to a far pointer. How can i move an integer value to a far pointer? Should i write assembly code for this? Can anyone help pls.
mehmet_341Asked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Kent OlsenDBACommented:

For this application, I doubt that you really want to convert an int value to a pointer.  However, it's really easy to do by simply recasting.

int  IValue;
char *CPtr;

  CPtr = (char *) IValue*4;


What you probably want to do is index the pointer.

*(Cptr + IValue*4);
CPtr[IValue*4];


What, specifically, do you need to do?
Kent
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
grg99Commented:
Another and easier way is to just make an array of far pointers, based at 0000:0000

typedef  void far * TheInts[100];

typedef    TheInts far*  IntBase;


IntBase   IntTab;


void setvect( int Index, void far * Ptr )
{
   IntTab = NULL; /* same as 0000:0000   */

   IntTab[ Index ] = Ptr;
}

   
0
PaulCaswellCommented:
mehmet,

grg is right but there are a couple of caveats in his code.

1) IntTab = NULL; /* same as 0000:0000   */
May not work with your compiler. Or at least, may not be '0000:0000'. Get an asm listing and check what the compiler generates.

2) And more crucially, you must disable interrupts while your change is being made. I realise this is a rare bug but it's exactly the kind that will bite you a few hours before ship time. Remember, a far address is usually 24 bits wide residing in 32 bits which will require at least 2, if not 4 memory accesses. What will happen if the interrupt you are replacing gets called WHILE YOU ARE CHANGING IT!!!?

So you need at least:

asm { cli };
IntTab[Index] = Ptr;
asm { sti };

Paul

0
grg99Commented:
Good points, Paul!

Although I don't personally know of any C compiler that uses anything other than 0000:0000 for NULL, it's theoretically possible.  

   Also some compilers might check for a NULL pointer access in debug mode and flag that as a bad error.

I hadnt thought of the half-changed problem-- it's rather unlikely but is going to eventually happen and cause major bombo.

0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
C

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.