• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 985
  • Last Modified:

RAID 1 or RAID 5?

Tell me if my concept of RAID is is on track or way off in east boofoo.  What I really want to know is which is faster, RAID 1 or RAID 5?

Configurations ranked by performance, 1 being fastest.

1. RAID 0 (Disk Striping)
2. RAID 5 (Disk Striping with Parity 0+1)
3. RAID 1 (Disk Mirroring)
 
Configurations ranked by redundancy/most reliable, 1 being most reliable.

1. RAID 1 (Disk Mirroring)
2. RAID 5 (Disk Striping with Parity 0+1)
3. RAID 0 (Disk Striping)
 
I understand that the number of disks used is also a variable in the speed of the array.  I could use as much input as possible.  I am trying to win an ongoing debate about this.
0
JasonCat
Asked:
JasonCat
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • +1
2 Solutions
 
sirbountyCommented:
Sounds like you're going to win the debate!
Here's a good article on RAID.
0
What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

 
1175089Commented:
The fastest conf is RAID 10 /striping +mirroring/, but you must use 4 disks. For RAID5 you must use 3 disks. This conf is slower than RAID 1 /mirror/ in write operations. /Reads are practically the same/. If you use RAID 0 /striping/ and one disk goes bad, you will lose ALL YOUR DATA!
0
 
chicagoanCommented:
The answer is an unqualified "it depends"
All things being equal raid0 will provide the highest performance - until you saturate your bus or HBA.

A fast raid controller on a 33mhz pci pus will probably perform just as well in raid5 as raid0, as you can't get enough data to it to make the parity calculation times meaningful. You have to comapre the pipe pf the array to the bus and subract the overhead to see if the raid level will affect throughput.

RAID1 can often be faster on reads as the data can be read from either drive.

RAID1 isn't anymore fault tolerant than RAID5 although you'll see less of a performance hit in a degraded state than because of the lack of parity calculations. You lose a disk it keeps on ticking. Either can use hot spares to mitigate a disk loss.

Dulplexing is the most fault tolereant, wherein two seperate controllers are used for mirroring ( raid 3/5 arrays can be mirrored as well)  

http://www.networkbuyersguide.com/search/149002.htm has some performance figures.
0
 
chicagoanCommented:
BTW: AFAIK east boofoo is just past the boonies... just go a mile past where the old schoolhouse burned down and turn left when you see a sleeping dog
0
 
CallandorCommented:
>BTW: AFAIK east boofoo is just past the boonies... just go a mile past where the old schoolhouse burned down and turn left when you see a sleeping dog

Aha!  I was wondering what was the name of that place! ;-)
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: ZipGrep

ZipGrep is a utility that can list and search zip (.war, .ear, .jar, etc) archives for text patterns, without the need to extract the archive's contents.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way to say thank you for being a part of the community.

  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • +1
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now