RAID 1 or RAID 5?

Tell me if my concept of RAID is is on track or way off in east boofoo.  What I really want to know is which is faster, RAID 1 or RAID 5?

Configurations ranked by performance, 1 being fastest.

1. RAID 0 (Disk Striping)
2. RAID 5 (Disk Striping with Parity 0+1)
3. RAID 1 (Disk Mirroring)
Configurations ranked by redundancy/most reliable, 1 being most reliable.

1. RAID 1 (Disk Mirroring)
2. RAID 5 (Disk Striping with Parity 0+1)
3. RAID 0 (Disk Striping)
I understand that the number of disks used is also a variable in the speed of the array.  I could use as much input as possible.  I am trying to win an ongoing debate about this.
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Sounds like you're going to win the debate!
Here's a good article on RAID.

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Big Business Goals? Which KPIs Will Help You

The most successful MSPs rely on metrics – known as key performance indicators (KPIs) – for making informed decisions that help their businesses thrive, rather than just survive. This eBook provides an overview of the most important KPIs used by top MSPs.

The fastest conf is RAID 10 /striping +mirroring/, but you must use 4 disks. For RAID5 you must use 3 disks. This conf is slower than RAID 1 /mirror/ in write operations. /Reads are practically the same/. If you use RAID 0 /striping/ and one disk goes bad, you will lose ALL YOUR DATA!
The answer is an unqualified "it depends"
All things being equal raid0 will provide the highest performance - until you saturate your bus or HBA.

A fast raid controller on a 33mhz pci pus will probably perform just as well in raid5 as raid0, as you can't get enough data to it to make the parity calculation times meaningful. You have to comapre the pipe pf the array to the bus and subract the overhead to see if the raid level will affect throughput.

RAID1 can often be faster on reads as the data can be read from either drive.

RAID1 isn't anymore fault tolerant than RAID5 although you'll see less of a performance hit in a degraded state than because of the lack of parity calculations. You lose a disk it keeps on ticking. Either can use hot spares to mitigate a disk loss.

Dulplexing is the most fault tolereant, wherein two seperate controllers are used for mirroring ( raid 3/5 arrays can be mirrored as well) has some performance figures.
BTW: AFAIK east boofoo is just past the boonies... just go a mile past where the old schoolhouse burned down and turn left when you see a sleeping dog
>BTW: AFAIK east boofoo is just past the boonies... just go a mile past where the old schoolhouse burned down and turn left when you see a sleeping dog

Aha!  I was wondering what was the name of that place! ;-)
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.