Solved

Slow memory clock speed.

Posted on 2003-12-09
4
1,345 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-09
I have an AthlonXP at 333mhz.  I also have 256MB DDR RAM at 400mhz.  My mother board supports DDR 400 memory and FSB but my memory only runs at 333mhz.

Is this because my CPU has max FSB at 333mhz? Can it be fixed?

Would over clocking the memory only do bad things?


daggoth_666
0
Comment
Question by:daggoth_666
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
4 Comments
 
LVL 13

Accepted Solution

by:
AlbertaBeef earned 130 total points
ID: 9909800
It is always best with AthlonXP's to run the memory synchronously with the cpu bus.

There are some motherboards that allow you to clock them asyncronously, as you've tried to do, but some don't.  Even on those that do allow asyncronous operation, it's been proven in many benchmark tests that the performance actually WORSENS if you run asynchronously.

Also of note, many people with boards that do allow asyncronous operation have noticed more errors / crashes trying to run this way.

So #1 problem is performance worsens, #2 problem is more frequent crashes/errors and #3 is some boards just don't allow it.

All - in - all, it's just not a good idea.

If, however, you get a 400MHz cpu, you should have no problems running both at 400MHz.
0
 
LVL 3

Assisted Solution

by:Mr_Skinny
Mr_Skinny earned 25 total points
ID: 9911926
AlbertaBeef is 100% correct on this, I have a board that supports these configurations and performance and stabilty is noticably better when the ram and cpu bus are in synch.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:daggoth_666
ID: 9919565
Thanks fellas.

daggoth_666
0
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:PaulPisces1964
ID: 9958621
This may be an exception, thought I would pass it along

FIC AN19EStealth (KT400 chipset)
XP2400+ CPU at 266
1GB Memory at DDR333
I have had excellent performance gain with this combination, compared to running at 266/266

Note: I got the biggest performance gain from doing striped RAID (two ATA100 with 8MB cache on each).

System running rock solid for 9 months, including MS SQL Server Developer Ed. with a fairly large database (over 4GB database file with 15M records). Also recently running NewsBin Pro with nearly 2M article headers loaded in the spool.

I have heard of issues running DDR400 with slower CPU on that chipset (plus the performance gain is small compared to the 266/333 gain).

-Paul
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Great sound, comfort and fit, excellent build quality, versatility, compatibility. These are just some of the many reasons for choosing a headset from Sennheiser.
On Beyond Tools A conversation I recently had with the DevOps manager of a major online retailer really made me think about DevOps monitoring tools (https://www.onpage.com/devops-incident-management-tool/). The manager and I discussed how sever…
There's a multitude of different network monitoring solutions out there, and you're probably wondering what makes NetCrunch so special. It's completely agentless, but does let you create an agent, if you desire. It offers powerful scalability …
Add bar graphs to Access queries using Unicode block characters. Graphs appear on every record in the color you want. Give life to numbers. Hopes this gives you ideas on visualizing your data in new ways ~ Create a calculated field in a query: …

688 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question