We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

AGP or USB video capture device to record from analog camcorder

Medium Priority
1,269 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-08
Similar questions have been asked but I can’t find a good solution for my requirements. Perhaps some easy points on offer here!

Basically I have been given a nice camcorder that works perfectly except the tape mechanism is shafted. My plan is to use it as a top dorris webcam! Hence I’m looking for a cheap AGP graphics card or external USB 2.0 video capture device with S-VIDEO and composite inputs. I would imagine the AGP route is the best way to go as I would like to compress the recorded video and audio in real time and so the more resources available to the CPU the better. I would most likely be sourcing this product form eBay.

Quality wise I’m not looking for professional results but it would be great to be able to capture at whatever the native resolution is of the analog camcorder is.

As you might be able to tell, video isn’t something I know a lot about; I’m an audio man really. Any help would be much appreciated!

Thanks!
Comment
Watch Question

CERTIFIED EXPERT
Top Expert 2012

Commented:
If you're looking for inexpensive, AGP is not the way to go (those ATI All-in-Wonders are expensive!).  Here's a couple of PCI video capture cards which have good quality:

Leadtek WinFast TV2000 $35 (thanks to buckeyes33 for this)
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=14-122-181&depa=1

The Flyvideo2000 is also a good PCI tuner card for around $46:
http://www.lifeview.com.tw/eng/pro_fly_2000.html
http://www.streetprices.com/Electronics/Computer_Hardware_PC/Video_Cards/Video_Capture/SP1243256.html

The recording process is not compute-intensive, but compressing avi to mpeg2 afterwards is.  If you want to record and compress on-the-fly, you will need a hardware compression card, like the Hauppauge PVR250, which costs about $150.  It will capture 640x480 at the highest quality at a rate of 2GB/hour.  If you want to edit your avi captures, Pinnacle Studio does a good job and is easy to use, and it will also compress.

Author

Commented:
I've found a cheap ATI ATI RADEON 64MB DDR VIVO on eBay. How would that do?
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Top Expert 2012

Commented:
Unlock this solution and get a sample of our free trial.
(No credit card required)
UNLOCK SOLUTION

Author

Commented:
Is the 7500 model just an upgraded ATI ATI RADEON 64MB DDR VIVO?
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Top Expert 2012
Commented:
Unlock this solution and get a sample of our free trial.
(No credit card required)
UNLOCK SOLUTION
Yes, the AIWs are superior to the one you mentioned.  I've had mine for about 3 years, and it gets as good results as anything currently available.  

 -JaffaKREE
 "Damn that Callandor - he's always one step ahead"

 

Author

Commented:
I could really do with a review of these cards in the context of video capture. 3D benchmarks aren't very relevent! I'd like to know maximum frame rates at what resolutions and so on. I know a Matrox Marvel G400 would be a safe bet but I'd like to see how it compares with newer cards.
The 7500 AIW can capture at up to 720x480 @ 30fps.  You don't need a higher framerate than that, anyway.  It uses about 40% processor on my 1.8ghz athlon with the fairly processor-intensive huffyuv capture codec.

CERTIFIED EXPERT
Top Expert 2012

Commented:
Having done video capture myself for a while, I would say there are other factors more important than ability to capture at a given framerate, because a very low-end video capture card can keep up with the best - that may be why there are no benchmarks.  Things like picture quality and audio sync (not the fault of the capture card) are far more pressing issues.

JaffaKREE, you should see the guys that are always one step ahead of me!  They respond in less than a minute of the post ;-)  (see MSAccess, Excel, Windows XP, for example)
Unlock this solution and get a sample of our free trial.
(No credit card required)
UNLOCK SOLUTION
Marius,
 
   I think most of your points apply to any capture card currently available (drivers, software, framerate).   I have to generally recommend against USB capture devices, I've seen too many throughput issues.

   Just a note, USA standard max broadcast/DVD resolution (Non-HDTV) = 720 x 480 or 640 x 480, @ 29.97 (Telecined Source)
                     EU = 720x576 @ 25fps, interlaced source.

Callandor - that actually scares me a little !

Commented:
I use the usb2800 (xpert DVD maker usb 2.0). It is better quality that some of the internal cards, and allows snapshots.
See this site www.kworldcomputer.com and the dvd maker usb2.0.
The dv/av expert card is also good. This one comes with PowerDirector, which is fairly good for creating small good quality mpegs.
At the end of the day I reckon it is the software to capture the video and create decent avi's/mpeg's that should be the decider. The hardware is much of a muchness in the cheap range (you have to spend several hundred dollars/quid to get a card to do hardware mpeg encoding). Most of the software that comes with telly cards that can take s-video input (that I have come across and I have several of them) is pretty useless for creating manageable mpegs.
Capture resources -

www.virtualdub.org
http://neuron2.net/     (Donald Graft's site)
www.tmpgenc.net
www.avisynth.org
http://www.cinemacraft.com/index.htm


You can pretty much throw away the software that comes with your card.  

Author

Commented:
I agree with JaffaKREE, I would probably install just drivers and nothing else.

tpilg, the Matrox Marvel series offer hardware MJPEG compression which would suite me well for then transcoding to xvid or divx.
Yes, i always forget about those TV standards...
And if you plan to use the card under Windows, there's just the need for the drivers. But his doesn't apply to other OS.
Take the Marvel as an example... It works OK under windows, except with may favourite Tv program - DScaler
(it seems a normal thing to me... Murphy never sleeps). And VirtualDub afaik has only BT878 support.
Starting the thing under X was a mess. After i managed it to start (and lost a few hours) there was no GL support any more. Which made
me just drop the thing and turn to my old ATI TV Wonder (which works without problems).
And as other guys told me, the All-In-Wonder series isn't better supported...

Author

Commented:
Well thanks for all your help. I ended up spending more than intended but I'm quite happy that a Hercules 3D Prophet AIW Radeon 8500DV is heading my way shortly for the reasonable price of £65 including P&P.

I was also considering the Matrox Marvel G400 but marius petrescu's comments put me off a little and at the end of the day, I bought a plain G400 when they first came out and that was about 5 years ago! That's a long, long time in this game! I'm sure when Half Life 2 comes I would have regretted buying a card that underpowered in the 3D stakes.

I'll let you know how I get on with it but should I give out points now? Will I be able to add to this question at a later date if I do that?

Thanks for everything!
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Top Expert 2012

Commented:
You can award points now if you felt people have contributed to your solution.  You can ask more questions if they're related to resolving this one, but different questions should be asked as separate questions.
Unlock the solution to this question.
Thanks for using Experts Exchange.

Please provide your email to receive a sample view!

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OR

Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.