Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

Error 53. Computer Name not found using a DOS 6.22 network boot client

Posted on 2004-03-25
12
Medium Priority
?
863 Views
Last Modified: 2007-12-19
Using network monitor I see the NS request from the client. I also see the reply from the server. I queried the MAC address to verify the NICS   I see in the capture.

The weird part is that I used this and other similar floppy disks and it worked in the past. I have turned on auditing. I have run MS Baseline Security Analyzer.

Thoughts, suggestions, help?
0
Comment
Question by:gee_gdavid
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 5
  • 3
12 Comments
 

Expert Comment

by:CYBERUG
ID: 10680235
I often get this error when having to do a ris install across a cisco router, to address the problem I normaly reduce the 10/100 nic down to 10mb so as to pass smoothly through the cisco hub or router.
If you have a config disk for the nic yous it to reduce to 10mb and reconfigureafter youve completed your install. (or leave at 10mb)(?).
0
 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:lstonge
ID: 10683341
Where do you get this problem? If it's when mapping a drive, just be sure the name of the server and the name of the share do not exceed 13 characters and contain no special characters or spaces. Also, you can't map drives with ip instead of name in dos, like \\192.168.0.x\sharename.

Give more info please. I often use network boot floppies to ghost computers to and from servers, for example, but there are many thing to consider, like the server o/s, the kind of link you want, the nic, etc.

If you have the same boot disk that was working before and it uses tcpip, do you try to map drives on a xp or 2003 computer? Then you would have to adjust some things, like disabling SMB signing in windows.

Luc
0
 

Author Comment

by:gee_gdavid
ID: 10683584
Here is some additional background.

The UNC is unchanged. For the last six months this UNC (server and share name) have not changed. The bootable floppies have not changed. The network infrastructure has not changed (no routers, using a switch). The change that was introduced was Windows update and the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer.

As I mentioned in the initial post, the client sends an NS request. The server responds to the request. The client sends the request one time only. The next traffic from the client is an ARP request to the gateway. At that point all traffic ceases and the client posts the Error 53.  The same client floppy can connect to a share on a Windows 2000 server.

I am suspicious of the anonymous settings on the 2003 server which I reversed to the high risk setting. The server was rebooted but the change was unproductive.

More ideas?
0
Introducing the WatchGuard 420 Access Point

WatchGuard's newest access point includes an 802.11ac Wave 2 chipset, providing the fastest speeds for VoIP, video and music streaming, and large data file transfers. Additionally, enjoy the benefits of strong security as the 3rd radio delivers dedicated WIPS protection!

 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:lstonge
ID: 10683734
The SMB signing is required by default on 2003 server. It is enabled but not required on 2000 server. It is not supported on DOS or win9x.

Check:

HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters\

REG_DWORD: RequireSecuritySignature=0 (default=1)

Luc
0
 

Author Comment

by:gee_gdavid
ID: 10740841
Sadly, the SMB parameter is set to 0.

HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters\

REG_DWORD: RequireSecuritySignature=0 (default=1)


Thus, the problem persists. More ideas?
0
 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:lstonge
ID: 10770122
Try to force "enable netbios" in tcpip properties (under wins tab).

Luc
0
 

Author Comment

by:gee_gdavid
ID: 10782803
Here is an update. I looked more closely at the network capture and found, in the NS reply that it includes two references. Remember that the source computer (Win 2003 Server) has two adapters on separate networks. 192.168.0.x and 192.168.100.x. The subnet is 255.255.255.0.  The order of the name references lists the "remote" network first. This is why I see traffic pointing to the gateway. Hmmm.  Two questions:
Why would the client work for months and now fail? Why would the server offer a single reply with two resolutions?

Ooops, a more important question: How do I fix this?

DW
0
 
LVL 4

Accepted Solution

by:
lstonge earned 2000 total points
ID: 10786835
Try to use the lmhosts file on the client to resolve the name locally.

content for lmhosts file:

<ip-of-server> <server-netbios-name> #PRE #DOM:<domain-netbios-name>

(Don't include the <>)


Check also this key on the 2003 server:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\RemoteAccess\Policy\Allow LM Authentication

It should be 1, change it if it is 0

This key can be changed be IAS or RRAS security.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;826157&Product=winsvr2003

I'm checking for the resolution problem but didn't find anything yet. But if you use the lmhosts file, it will bypass this problem for now.

Luc
0
 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:lstonge
ID: 10786856
BTW ms-dos is not mentionned in this q826157 but it applies to it also.

Luc
0

Featured Post

What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

During and after that shift to cloud, one area that still poses a struggle for many organizations is what to do with their department file shares.
This article is in regards to the Cisco QSFP-4SFP10G-CU1M cables, which are designed to uplink/downlink 40GB ports to 10GB SFP ports. I recently experienced this and found very little configuration documentation on how these are supposed to be confi…
If you're a developer or IT admin, you’re probably tasked with managing multiple websites, servers, applications, and levels of security on a daily basis. While this can be extremely time consuming, it can also be frustrating when systems aren't wor…
In this brief tutorial Pawel from AdRem Software explains how you can quickly find out which services are running on your network, or what are the IP addresses of servers responsible for each service. Software used is freeware NetCrunch Tools (https…

688 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question