We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

Check out our new AWS podcast with Certified Expert, Phil Phillips! Listen to "How to Execute a Seamless AWS Migration" on EE or on your favorite podcast platform. Listen Now

x

AMD vs Intel

keneso
keneso asked
on
Medium Priority
569 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-09
I need a fast comparison, and if AMD is good for gaming; given equal speed, of course.

Thanks
Comment
Watch Question

CERTIFIED EXPERT
Top Expert 2012
Commented:
Unlock this solution and get a sample of our free trial.
(No credit card required)
UNLOCK SOLUTION
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Top Expert 2012

Commented:
From previous discussions, Athlons and Durons are better performance and value up to 2.4GHz.  The  Intels with 800 FSB get better at that point up to the new 64-bit processors.  Things are up in the air at that point, with AMD and Intel trying to outdo each other every month.
Okay, here's the quick explanation. (well...quick by my standards).
The AMD chips run on better architecture, this is their strength. They lack in Clockspeed. That's why the Athlon XP processors have everything in performance numbers, such as 3000+ etc when they really mean 2. something GHz. They have an FSB around 333 or 400 depending on what the chip is and the mobo. The durons...well...let's stay away from the durons =). This is something they call quadspeed architecture, I don't want to go into that but basically they pipeline better and solve problems a bit faster.
I personally perfer the Athlons
1) price
2) On my benchmarks (ie, whether the games lag or not on two similar machines with the CPU being the difference) I've seen the Athlon XPs beat the P4s.
3)price

For the Intels, well, the P4 HTs with 800MHz FSB are pretty damn good, problem, price. Also, a lot of machines won't use that FSB for the whole way depending on the chipset (I remember a certain VIA chipset screwing up...at least I think it was VIA).
My reccomendations for a gaming CPU?
Well...if you have the money...the Intel P4:with Hyper Threading EE (extreme edition) would be sweet, the thing has 2MB L2 cache (huge).
Otherwise I'd go with the Athlon 3200+, it's a good price
http://www.pricewatch.com
and there are some awesome boards for it, I like the ASUS boards meself.
As for the 64-bit chips? well..chip (AMD 64), I would hold off. the big advantage is a 1600MHz FSB, but they won't become completely useful (and the price won't drop) until a 64-bit version of windows comes out (pretty soon apparently, a beta is almost ready).

Final verdict: Athlon 3200+
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Top Expert 2012

Commented:
CERTIFIED EXPERT

Commented:
amd=fast and tend to overheat more then intel
intel=stability

p.s. i like more AMD for gaming and it's more hot then intel but with proper cooling, it my best choice.

Author

Commented:
>>Now what?

It's better the GeForce, or Radeon?
Just kidding ;)

Thank you both.

Phoenix92x,

Please take a look here.

I went on to read Callandor's first link, came back accepted the comment, and saw the rest.

I was temted to wait for AlbertaBeef to give him the points, but what the heck Callandor's timing was good ;)
Unlock the solution to this question.
Thanks for using Experts Exchange.

Please provide your email to receive a sample view!

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OR

Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.