Avatar of jsfald
jsfald asked on

Config problems, "error some other host already uses"

I have two network cards and was working on eth1. Something happened when I was figuring out how to change the settings via command prompt to make an error occur on eth0. The error says "error some other host already uses this ip address."  Nothing is using the ip address and I can't ping it or locate it in any way.

I am also seeing a "netfilter" message pop up. when I restart things. I don't remember that in the past.

Thank you in advance for your help.
Linux Networking

Avatar of undefined
Last Comment
PaulS_III

8/22/2022 - Mon
SOLUTION
anupnellip

Log in or sign up to see answer
Become an EE member today7-DAY FREE TRIAL
Members can start a 7-Day Free trial then enjoy unlimited access to the platform
Sign up - Free for 7 days
or
Learn why we charge membership fees
We get it - no one likes a content blocker. Take one extra minute and find out why we block content.
See how we're fighting big data
Not exactly the question you had in mind?
Sign up for an EE membership and get your own personalized solution. With an EE membership, you can ask unlimited troubleshooting, research, or opinion questions.
ask a question
ASKER
jsfald

They both seem to be set correctly. But it is difficult to tell. This is why. ifconfig -a doesn't show the IP addresses at all. Also when the computer starts it displays one address 10.100.1.14 for eth0 and another address 64.72.*.* (The stars are real numbers) for the eth1 address. I am getting the error message for both of them now.

Also, the GUI that comes with Redhat shows the proper ip addresses. It just can't save it properly because of the error.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
PaulS_III

Log in or sign up to see answer
Become an EE member today7-DAY FREE TRIAL
Members can start a 7-Day Free trial then enjoy unlimited access to the platform
Sign up - Free for 7 days
or
Learn why we charge membership fees
We get it - no one likes a content blocker. Take one extra minute and find out why we block content.
See how we're fighting big data
Not exactly the question you had in mind?
Sign up for an EE membership and get your own personalized solution. With an EE membership, you can ask unlimited troubleshooting, research, or opinion questions.
ask a question
ASKER
jsfald

Let me give some more background.

The server is behind a physical firewall with one-to-one NAT set up. (The ip address for eth0 was 10.100.1.14 with the public ipaddress assigned to it.)

eth1 had an ip address 10.100.1.11 but nothing useful was mapped to it. The firewall has a WAN, LAN, and DMZ ports. I was assigned to move the email services from one server to this server so I wanted to start using eth1. I also wanted to hook up one connection to the DMZ.

This is "briefly" what happened.
I was using an ssh client connected to the eth0 address. I typed i"fconfig eth1 <public ip address>" and hit enter by accident when I was trying to look at the man pages for the syntax and other options. At that point my ssh connection was disconnect and I lost all network access to the server.

At a shell prompt I tried "service network restart". The network cards will be shutdown "OK" but then fail to restart. The error again is.  "Error some other host already uses this IP address" and it will state the respective IP address. It would also say "2000-2002 Netfilter..." or something like that, which I haven't seen before.

When I type "ifconfig -a" the three adapters lo, eth0, and eth1 will display but the eth* does not show any IP addresses.

Here is a funny thing that happened. I restarted the computer. On the screen it showed the "login:" prompt. I disconnected the cable from the DMZ port and plugged it into the switch. On the screen it said "e100: eth0 NIC Link is down" (I don't remember exactly) but then on the next line it said "e100: eth0 NIC Link is up 100 Mbps Full duplex."  What is that all about? Is that normal for something like that to display when I haven't logged in and the symptoms above still exist?

After a few hours of using the GUI, "netconfig", and interfaces I was getting no where so I decided to not use the DMZ and assign the cards ip address of 10.100.1.15 and 10.100.1.16. I then changed, or my coworker, then changed the firewall settings to map the public IP address to these two addresses.

The server is working fine with the NAT set up. But I would still like to know I had this problem and if this problem is going to come up next time I try to restart my network service. I would still like to get the DMZ set up but am scared to change the settings and restart the network just to get the same error.

ASKER
jsfald

I'll change the question a little.
Could smbd and nmbd configuration make the network service think the addresses are already taken?

What are the steps necessary to setup one card on the LAN and one card on the DMZ?  
Your help has saved me hundreds of hours of internet surfing.
fblack61
ASKER
jsfald

I still don't know what setting was being kept in memory or why it happened. I don't what to lose 300 points withoug a definite solution. Oh, well, have 150 points each for your suggestions.
PaulS_III

Thanks. I wish I could have helped you more.

Paul