We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

Cisco 2621 Port Address Translation Vs. Network Address Translation

Mohonk
Mohonk asked
on
Medium Priority
478 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-04
We want to successfully NAT specific ports to a internal server ip. For example our exchange 2003 server. Only port 80 53 21 should be Natted through our router to the server.
When we NAT those individual ports through our router it doesnt work. (Cant browse the internet, or send outside emails.)
ip nat inside source static tcp 10.9.200.2 53 xx.xxx.xxx.xxx 53 extendable
ip nat inside source static udp 10.9.200.2 53 xx.xxx.xxx.xxx 53 extendable
ip nat inside source static tcp 10.9.200.2 80 xx.xxx.xxx.xxx 80 extendable
ip nat inside source static tcp 10.9.200.2 21 xx.xxx.xxx.xxx 21 extendable


When we NAT everything to the server everything works fine. Even when we setup the windows 2003 built in firewall and block everything except the desired ports.

ip nat inside source static 10.9.200.2 xx.xxx.xxx.xxx extendable

This happens on 2003 2000 and XP Pro machines all the same.  
So why would the router not allow the NATting of indivuidual ports?
Comment
Watch Question

Top Expert 2009
Commented:
Unlock this solution and get a sample of our free trial.
(No credit card required)
UNLOCK SOLUTION

Author

Commented:
Your the man thanks!
Unlock the solution to this question.
Thanks for using Experts Exchange.

Please provide your email to receive a sample view!

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OR

Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.