Improve company productivity with a Business Account.Sign Up

x
?
Solved

Upgrade path from Linksys BEFVP41 router

Posted on 2004-04-09
1
Medium Priority
?
510 Views
Last Modified: 2008-02-01
We want to expand our 3 locations VPN network to 12 locations that use the VPN feature of Linksys BEFVP41 routers for our VPN network over DSL.  We do not know whether the BEFVP41 router can really support the load at the center of this "star network".  I am seek suggestions and opinions about our plan.  The conditions are:
1>  This network is for daily internal email and a burst of "end of day" data transfer. (a few MB per location)
2>  No real application run over the wire.  There may be VNC session to administer the system.
3> We have limited budger.
My questions:
1> Do we need a better router at the center of the "star"?
2> If so, what is the upgrade path? (not limited to Linksys, other vender like CISCO will be consider)


Thanks ahead

FC
0
Comment
Question by:FrankChamp
1 Comment
 
LVL 17

Accepted Solution

by:
mikecr earned 150 total points
ID: 10792797
If your using a hub and spoke technology to connect your remote sites together, the Linksys would probably do fine int that capacity, however the termination point would be more of a concern. Since your terminating more than one tunnel onto the router, the overhead for 12 tunnels would be more than the processing power of the BEFVP41 can handle because they don't have the horse power to be a termination point. You could either get a Cisco Concentrator to terminate all of these tunnels on or even a Cisco 3620/40 running the IPSEC IOS and it should do the trick. A Cisco 3620, using the IPSEC IOS, can effectively handle 200 IPSEC tunnels with modest throughput.
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: ZipGrep

ZipGrep is a utility that can list and search zip (.war, .ear, .jar, etc) archives for text patterns, without the need to extract the archive's contents.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way to say thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

New Server 172.16.200.2  was moved from behind Router R2 f0/1 to behind router R1 int f/01 and has now address 172.16.100.2. But we want users still to be able to connected to it by old IP. How to do it ? We can used destination NAT (DNAT).  In DNAT…
We've been using the Cisco/Linksys RV042 for years as: - an internet Gateway - a site-to-site VPN device - a leased line site-to-site subnet-to-subnet interface (And, here I'm assuming that any RV0xx behaves the same way as an RV042.  So that's …
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…

579 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question