Solved

how to implement an expandable array?

Posted on 2004-04-10
8
1,485 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-23
Can anyone provide a solution to this:

Write an expandable array like java.util.vector.
The code should  contain:  

private Object[];

purblic void add(Object o);
public int size();
public Object get(int index);
public void remove(int index);

also indicate where your code could be modified to have better efficiency.

Thanks,

RD
0
Comment
Question by:rdong
8 Comments
 
LVL 86

Accepted Solution

by:
CEHJ earned 32 total points
ID: 10796818
Since this is classwork, we can only give general advice. This is the most important method you'll need:

http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/System.html#arraycopy(java.lang.Object, int, java.lang.Object, int, int)
0
 

Author Comment

by:rdong
ID: 10797883
Thanks a lot,

It is not a classwork but a skill evaluation question which I did not do very well. So I would like to see different solutions. But thanks for your direction.

RD
0
 
LVL 3

Assisted Solution

by:shaggyb
shaggyb earned 31 total points
ID: 10798030
i would implement a linked list

a linked list is a data structure in which a seiries of node objects with data types of Node nextNode in them   and they point to the next node in the list.......

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linked_list


check that out for some decent ifno
0
Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 

Assisted Solution

by:kimboon
kimboon earned 31 total points
ID: 10798243
Try this:

-------------------------------------------
public class MyArray {
  private int max = 10;
  private Object[] objs = new Object[max];
  private int increment = 10;
  private int size = 0;

  public void add( Object o ) {
    if (size == max ) {
      max = max + increment;
      Object[] temp = new Object[max];
      System.arraycopy( objs, 0, temp, 0, size );
      objs = temp;
    }

    objs[size++] = o;
  }

  public int size() {
    return size;
  }

  public void remove(int index) {
    System.arraycopy(objs, index+1, objs, index, size-index);
    objs[--size] = null;
  }

  public Object get( int index) {
    if (index>=size || index <0) throw new ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException();
    return objs[index];
  }
}
-------------------------------------------
kimboon
0
 
LVL 9

Assisted Solution

by:keteracel
keteracel earned 31 total points
ID: 10800708
If it's a skill evaluation then the first thing you should do is question why they don't allow you to use java.util.Vector (or java.util.LinkedList or any of the other Collections) as this is one of the main points of using an Object Orientated language: reuse of classes. Also, the people at Sun have been developing this for years so their solution will be far better optimised than anything you could come up with in a short period of time.

If you HAVE to create your own the one above looks about right EXCEPT the size you should return is the number of items that have been added, not the physical size of the array as if you try to return an uninitialised cell you'll get an unwanted Exception. (i.e. java.util.Vector returns the number of items added not the physical size of the internal storage array). Also, wherever possible, you should try to implement applicable interfaces. In this case, implementing the Collection  interface would make the class very useful (and powerful).
0
 

Expert Comment

by:kimboon
ID: 10800918
Hi keteracel, the code I posted does return the number of items, study the code carefully I'm sure you will get it. :)

I agree with you that we should always consider the use of existing API. I'm sure rdong is aware of Vector class (since he mentioned it himself), but I believe his purpose is to understand how we can implement a Vector class using the basic array... Or maybe is just to know how Java array can be "expandable" ? I don't know, leave it to rdong to answer :)

BTW, to make my code posted above complete, I forgot to include the checking of index in remove() method.

Thanks.
0

Featured Post

Secure Your Active Directory - April 20, 2017

Active Directory plays a critical role in your company’s IT infrastructure and keeping it secure in today’s hacker-infested world is a must.
Microsoft published 300+ pages of guidance, but who has the time, money, and resources to implement? Register now to find an easier way.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
jdbc error in jsp application 20 73
check java version using powershell 13 297
collection output issue 9 62
java mysql insert application 14 44
An old method to applying the Singleton pattern in your Java code is to check if a static instance, defined in the same class that needs to be instantiated once and only once, is null and then create a new instance; otherwise, the pre-existing insta…
Go is an acronym of golang, is a programming language developed Google in 2007. Go is a new language that is mostly in the C family, with significant input from Pascal/Modula/Oberon family. Hence Go arisen as low-level language with fast compilation…
Video by: Michael
Viewers learn about how to reduce the potential repetitiveness of coding in main by developing methods to perform specific tasks for their program. Additionally, objects are introduced for the purpose of learning how to call methods in Java. Define …
This theoretical tutorial explains exceptions, reasons for exceptions, different categories of exception and exception hierarchy.

749 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question