• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 12351
  • Last Modified:

disk scheduling -FCFS, SCAN, CSCAN, SSTF

I know how these method works, but I'm woundering,
if the request queue is like this: 15, 33, 45, 8, 10, 75, 15, 33
diskhead: 30
So if 50% of the request are for the fixed cylinders, which method{fcfs, scan, cscan, sstf} is likely to have a better performance for this case?

I think the sstf method will have a better performance, because if we know the requests, then It is no point to use cscan, and scan method, because they both perfrom unnecssary checking after the cylinder 75.
SSTF: 30(diskhead)->33->33->45->75->15->15->10->8(total seek:112)
SCAN: 30->33->33->45->75->99(end of platter)->15->15->10->8(total :166)
CSCAN:30->33->33->45->75->99->0->8->10->15->15(total :258)

can anyone give me some ideas cos I'm not too sure...
Thanks in advance.
  • 4
  • 4
2 Solutions
Hi redsar,

You are right  ... in this case, sstf will give the best performance

but the best strategy perhaps would have been
30->8-> ... ->75 total 22+67=89
redsarAuthor Commented:
thanks for your reply...
so , in general, SSTF will give us the best performance among the those strategy(sstf, scan, csan, fcfs) if we know 50% of the request are for a small, fixed number of cylinders?

so the best strategy by taking advantage of this "hot spot" on the disk would be the LOOK scheduling
as you mentioned?
In what I mentioned, the idea was
if ( current < max && current > min )
         get current - min ; get max-current ... which ever value is smaller, start with that end (min/max)

>SSTF will give us the best performance among the those strategy(sstf, scan, csan, fcfs) if we know
>50% of the request are for a small, fixed number of cylinders?
Generally sstf is best but there can be degenerate cases where other algorithms will perform better or atleast the same ...e.g head at 80 and requests for 99 and 0
Improve Your Query Performance Tuning

In this FREE six-day email course, you'll learn from Janis Griffin, Database Performance Evangelist. She'll teach 12 steps that you can use to optimize your queries as much as possible and see measurable results in your work. Get started today!

Hi redsar,

There have been variants of SCAN and CSCAN which dont seek to end of platter.They consider the last request on the queue and then scan back.

But yes,SSTF does give you the best performance most of the times.
redsarAuthor Commented:
thanks , got the idea
and If this is the linked list for the request:
and I wanna perform SCAN algorithum :
what I think is using the disk head to divide the linked list into two sub linked list,
one is sorted: 72->90
another: 47->33->8
and then combine that....and then take the first from the linked list and then free that process,
but it seems pretty messy to do that, any simpler or any other ideas,
thanks again?
1. maintain doubly linked list ...
2. sort it
3. start from smallest request > disk head ... proceed till end of disk
4. back to original (starting position of step 3) ... traverse the list in other direction
redsarAuthor Commented:
well....i supposed to use a single linked list, rather than a double linked list..
In that case there is no other way except the one you listed
redsarAuthor Commented:
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Creating Active Directory Users from a Text File

If your organization has a need to mass-create AD user accounts, watch this video to see how its done without the need for scripting or other unnecessary complexities.

  • 4
  • 4
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now