Solved

Using QueryPerformanceCounter in Perf Counter

Posted on 2004-04-15
4
429 Views
Last Modified: 2010-08-05
I am using QueryPerformanceCounter to determine the amount of time a function takes (transforming XSL templates), and applying that value to a PerformanceCounter object (AverageTimer32) using the following psuedo-code:
            _perfmonAvg = New PerformanceCounter("PG", "TimeToTransform", Me.ID.ToString, False)
            _perfmonBase = New PerformanceCounter("PG", "TimeToTransformBase", Me.ID.ToString, False)
            ' End If
            _perfmonAvg.RawValue = 0
            _perfmonBase.RawValue = 0

    Private Sub StartTime()
        QueryPerformanceCounter(_startTime)
    End Sub
    Private Sub UpdatePerformance()
        Try
            Dim _end As Int64
            QueryPerformanceCounter(_end)
            _timetotransform = _end - _startTime
            _perfmonAvg.IncrementBy(_timetotransform)
            _perfmonBase.Increment()
        Catch oE As Exception
        End Try

    End Sub

------------------------------
When I look at the performance counter, I get a value of .778 if the scale is set to 10,000.
I've looked at  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;306978, but it doesn't answer my questions:
1) What is the .778 value in reference to seconds ? (ms, microsecs,ticks? )
2) Do I need to divide using QueryPerformanceFrequency to determine secs/ms?
3) what is the proper setting for the scale to make this read in ms?

Thanks Experts!

0
Comment
Question by:lrr81765
4 Comments
 
LVL 22

Accepted Solution

by:
_TAD_ earned 250 total points
ID: 10835711


I'm not quite certain, but it should be pretty easy to determine.  I mean, after all you are talking about powers of 10 here.  Did the process take 2 seconds or did it take 20 seconds?  and ticks... there are 60 ticks to a second, and there are 1,000 ms to second and 100,000 microseconds to a second



soooo... at a scale of 10,000 and you get .778

If it took approx. 7-8 seconds to complete, you are using ms

if it took a bare fraction of a second you are using microseconds or ticks


Based on your scale and your number I'd guess it to be ms
0
 
LVL 48

Assisted Solution

by:Mikal613
Mikal613 earned 250 total points
ID: 10835744
0

Featured Post

Master Your Team's Linux and Cloud Stack!

The average business loses $13.5M per year to ineffective training (per 1,000 employees). Keep ahead of the competition and combine in-person quality with online cost and flexibility by training with Linux Academy.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

IP addresses can be stored in a database in any of several ways.  These ways may vary based on the volume of the data.  I was dealing with quite a large amount of data for user authentication purpose, and needed a way to minimize the storage.   …
A basic question.. “What is the Garbage Collector?” The usual answer given back: “Garbage collector is a background thread run by the CLR for freeing up the memory space used by the objects which are no longer used by the program.” I wondered …
Established in 1997, Technology Architects has become one of the most reputable technology solutions companies in the country. TA have been providing businesses with cost effective state-of-the-art solutions and unparalleled service that is designed…
The Email Laundry PDF encryption service allows companies to send confidential encrypted  emails to anybody. The PDF document can also contain attachments that are embedded in the encrypted PDF. The password is randomly generated by The Email Laundr…

803 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question