Solved

ISCSI versus SAN

Posted on 2004-04-22
7
594 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-15
Would like to know opinions. I have been using EMC's DMX/Clariion etc. My management has asked me to look for alternatives to EMC (due to the price and attitude).

Looking at ISCSI seems to be much cheaper, less infrastructure costs and no additional personnel to manage my switches since we have the network folks to manage the network.

Also, which company's are on the forefront.

Please advise.

UNC
0
Comment
Question by:Unix_NT_Consultant
7 Comments
 
LVL 6

Accepted Solution

by:
prof666 earned 500 total points
Comment Utility
Well, Many companies support iSCSI, HDS IBM HP to name a few. The DMX is iSCSI capable also. Clariion is not. You can also get iSCSI software from storageTek that will turn a normal windows file server into an iSCSI share box.
You need to be careful about your assumptions of iSCSI. It is only good if you have a dedicated gig ethernet network, and all servers are on gig. Any host on less than gig will bomb badly. You're correct in saying that it is cheaper and less management overhead, but typically you need to invest in a separate LAN to segregate out traditional IP from  iSCSI (at least separate core switches), and thioe core gig switches are not cheap.
Overall it's worth doing, but remember that iSCSI is still in it's infantcy and it maybe worth running a pilot for a few non critical servers first before leaping in.

My overall opinion is talk to HDS, their pricepoint is a lot less that EMC, and they are very flexible and will talk through this with you, and can even setup a lab for you to play with options (depends upon which country you are in). HDS main labs are in Silicon Valley in US and in Stoke Pogen (N Slough) in UK. Manybe i'm Biased...I used to work for them in storage division.

Da Proff
0
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:prof666
Comment Utility
Oh for an edit key..my typing is sooo bad...

Da Proff
0
 
LVL 2

Expert Comment

by:prasanna_lakkundi
Comment Utility
IBM has an array of offerings in iSCSI and SAN's both. I also think IBM has a good global support too(so making it easy to get support where ever u are).
0
Threat Intelligence Starter Resources

Integrating threat intelligence can be challenging, and not all companies are ready. These resources can help you build awareness and prepare for defense.

 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:dovidmichel
Comment Utility
I also like iSCSI but it might be a good idea to do an evaluation first. Figure out things like level of service, up time, current and future amount of storage needed, backup. For example streaming video needs very high through put and so you have to make sure the iSCSI offering will be able to provide that level of service. There are iSCSI controlers that have a processor on board to handle the overhead associated with IP. They can greatly increase the throughput and the cost. I'm not familure with HDS but it sounds like might be a good fit for what you need. It would also be good to speak with HP because they are coming out with a lower cost SAN offering that might be a good fit. One last thought the more you know about your needs the better they will be able to help you and the more likely your project will succeed, so do the background work.
0
 

Expert Comment

by:qlgc
Comment Utility
The current comanies with availible products in iSCSI Storage are:
Eurologic and Intransa and NetApp.
If the loading on your server CPU is of importance on the host side,
There is Intel, Adaptac, Alacritech, and QLogic.
0
 

Expert Comment

by:qlgc
Comment Utility
Clarification:
iSCSI is SAN.
SAN and FC have become synonyms over the years,
but FC was the protocol of choice for SAN
with iSCSI being the alternative protocol for SAN now.

0
 

Expert Comment

by:dfranklin80
Comment Utility
I am in the middle of evaluating SANS from several vendors.  I've ruled out ISCSI at this point as I don't beleive the product it "there" yet and I will never put mission critical apps on bleading edge technology.

Using more traditional SANS with Fiber Channel Drives and SATA drives, I've looked at EMC, HP and Hitachi.  Thus far, Hitachi seems to be the price leader offering more storage and higher throughput for less money.
0

Featured Post

How to improve team productivity

Quip adds documents, spreadsheets, and tasklists to your Slack experience
- Elevate ideas to Quip docs
- Share Quip docs in Slack
- Get notified of changes to your docs
- Available on iOS/Android/Desktop/Web
- Online/Offline

Join & Write a Comment

Suggested Solutions

Storage devices are generally used to save the data or sometime transfer the data from one computer system to another system. However, sometimes user accidentally erased their important data from the Storage devices. Users have to know how data reco…
VM backup deduplication is a method of reducing the amount of storage space needed to save VM backups. In most organizations, VMs contain many duplicate copies of data, such as VMs deployed from the same template, VMs with the same OS, or VMs that h…
This tutorial will show how to configure a new Backup Exec 2012 server and move an existing database to that server with the use of the BEUtility. Install Backup Exec 2012 on the new server and apply all of the latest hotfixes and service packs. The…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of installing of Data Protection Manager on a server running Windows Server 2012 R2, including the prerequisites. Microsoft .Net 3.5 is required. To install this feature, go to Server Manager…

763 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

10 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now