Solved

Bonding 2 T1's

Posted on 2004-04-26
4
573 Views
Last Modified: 2008-03-17
I have a T1 from Time Warner and another from Cogent and I would like to know if I can bond these to create a 3 MB pipe on a Cisco 2600 series Router?  If not is there a means for me to load balance these two pipes?
0
Comment
Question by:genekurtz
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 4

Accepted Solution

by:
glebn earned 500 total points
ID: 10922884
While it's not cheap, we use a device which aggregates multiple Internet connections and it has worked well, although the initial configuration can be a little tricky if you're doing NAT on the routers. The device we use is called a Fatpipe Warp. However, a quick look at Fatpipe's site shows me that they significantly changed their product line so the Warp is probably too high end. The fatpipe site is http://www.fatpipeinc.com/ , my guess is that the Xtreme or Slipstream product line is best for your purposes.

Note that I have absolutely no relationship with Fatpipe (I'm the tech director at a high school) I'm just suggesting their product because we faced the same problem a couple of years again and it has worked well.
0
 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:glebn
ID: 10922894
By the way, we are aggregatting two T1's using Cisco 2600 routers also so our configuration is very similar to yours.
0
 
LVL 79

Expert Comment

by:lrmoore
ID: 10923400
Without something like the fatpipe extreme (big $$), you cannot 'bond' the two T1's. You can enable BGP and load balancing, but that will also cost $$ to get your own IP addresses and AS number. Where are you doing your NAT? Best bet may be to use a creative route-map and do some load sharing and failover, but you can't do true load balancing with your current setup.
In order to bond two or more T1's into a true multilink pipe, you have to do it on both ends of the T1.
0
 
LVL 11

Expert Comment

by:PennGwyn
ID: 10932337
Note that "both ends of the T1" is not going to be possible when they go to two different places.

In fact, with two different ISPs, you probably need to have two different outside address blocks, one supplied by each.  Either might reject traffic whose source address is part of the other's block.  So getting this to work is *not* going to be both easy and cheap.

Getting your own AS and net block is the "right" way to do it.  Probably at least one of these ISPs will be willing to hold your hand through the process.

0

Featured Post

How your wiki can always stay up-to-date

Quip doubles as a “living” wiki and a project management tool that evolves with your organization. As you finish projects in Quip, the work remains, easily accessible to all team members, new and old.
- Increase transparency
- Onboard new hires faster
- Access from mobile/offline

Join & Write a Comment

Article by: IanTh
Hi Guys After a whole weekend getting wake on lan over the internet working, I thought I would share the experience. Your firewall has to have a port forward for port 9 udp to your local broadcast x.x.x.255 but if that doesnt work, do it to a …
Short answer to this question: there is no effective WiFi manager in iOS devices as seen in Windows WiFi or Macbook OSx WiFi management, but this article will try and provide some amicable solutions to better suite your needs.
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
Get a first impression of how PRTG looks and learn how it works.   This video is a short introduction to PRTG, as an initial overview or as a quick start for new PRTG users.

743 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

9 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now