Solved

one-to-one nat

Posted on 2004-04-28
4
313 Views
Last Modified: 2010-05-18
From what I understand by default sonic walls lock down all port unless specified otherwise.  However I have been told that when I enable one-to-one nat this is not true for the public IPs I am forwarding.  Is this the case?  And if so when I start shutting down ports should I shut down the ports for the publics IPs or for the private IPs the Public IPs are being forwarded to or both?  Thanks.
0
Comment
Question by:srawtvl
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 23

Expert Comment

by:Tim Holman
ID: 10940729
When you enable one-to-one NAT, you will also need to create a rule to allow traffic to hit those addresses.

For example, mail server public IP 20.20.20.20, private IP 192.168.0.1 -

You would enable one-to-one NAT to translate 20.20.20.20 to 192.168.0.1.
You would then create a firewall rule to allow port 25 to hit 20.20.20.20.

You do NOT need any more than this.  Everything else is implicitly denied, and traffic that is translated (as long as it's port 25) will be routed through to your private address without any additional rules.
0
 

Author Comment

by:srawtvl
ID: 10951550
This is not true.  I set up a bsd server behind the firewall and pointed a public IP to the private IP addy the bsd box is on.  I did not change any permissions on the firewall.  I am able to SSH to the bsd box from outside our network.  Can someone tell me if I should block ports to the public IP in this case or the private or both? and can someone tell me what sonic wall means by default in their services list?  is it the same as any on a cisco router?
0
 

Author Comment

by:srawtvl
ID: 10952545
OK so I answered my own question.  For anyone else who may need to know heres the deal.

Sonic wall explicitely allows everything.  You have to go in and remove the rules for the service "default" expect for where the source is LAN.

If you are using one-to-one nat you have to then go in and allow the services you need to the PRIVATE addresses.

And default means everything...how intuitive
0
 
LVL 23

Accepted Solution

by:
Tim Holman earned 500 total points
ID: 10958198
..yet another firewall vendor doing things slightly different to confuse us !  :)
0

Featured Post

Networking for the Cloud Era

Join Microsoft and Riverbed for a discussion and demonstration of enhancements to SteelConnect:
-One-click orchestration and cloud connectivity in Azure environments
-Tight integration of SD-WAN and WAN optimization capabilities
-Scalability and resiliency equal to a data center

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
firewall rule terminology 3 45
Workarround to disable "no split tunneling" from client Software checkpoint 1 74
Cisco asax sourcefire Ips 7 69
ASE reports it as spam 2 635
Wikipedia defines 'Script Kiddies' in this informal way: "In hacker culture, a script kiddie, occasionally script bunny, skiddie, script kitty, script-running juvenile (SRJ), or similar, is a derogatory term used to describe those who use scripts or…
Do you have a windows based Checkpoint SmartCenter for centralized Checkpoint management?  Have you ever backed up the firewall policy residing on the SmartCenter?  If you have then you know the hassles of connecting to the server, doing an upgrade_…
With Secure Portal Encryption, the recipient is sent a link to their email address directing them to the email laundry delivery page. From there, the recipient will be required to enter a user name and password to enter the page. Once the recipient …
A short tutorial showing how to set up an email signature in Outlook on the Web (previously known as OWA). For free email signatures designs, visit https://www.mail-signatures.com/articles/signature-templates/?sts=6651 If you want to manage em…

856 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question