Solved

VBA::_ErrObject

Posted on 2004-04-29
4
738 Views
Last Modified: 2007-12-19
Hello.

I've got such a problem. In Visual Basic I have made ActiveX Dll and function like:

Public Sub showError(error as ErrObject)
...
End sub

A this Dll I want to use in VC++
I create IDL file, compile it, generated .c and .h files were added to project a compiled.

But then the function in VC++ looks like:
HRESULT showError(VBA::_ErrObject **error);

And I don't know how to create that VBA::_ErrObject in VC++.
It look like it is a normal COM object (_ErrObject) but _ErrObjectPtr.CreateInstance doesn't work.

I have #import msvbvm60.dll used.

Thanks for help.

0
Comment
Question by:hanzelko
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 9

Expert Comment

by:_ys_
ID: 10948680
Within VB ErrObject is non-creatable. It's static. Try making:
Set objError = New ErrObject
work.

Expose a GetErrObject from your VB ActiveX DLL and use it to obtain a pointer to ErrObject from VC++. At least you'll get an ErrObject pointer which you can pass to showError.
0
 

Author Comment

by:hanzelko
ID: 10958419
Hi.

I have tried it.
But Set objError = new ErrObject doesn't work.
It throws exception ActiveX cant create object in VB.

So I have used
Set objError = err     // return global error object.

This works, but behaves buggy. Something in objErrr is set when I call showError but description is not set.
It looks like the objError is the same global err object and objErr.descritption is empty.

So where can be problem.
0
 
LVL 9

Accepted Solution

by:
_ys_ earned 125 total points
ID: 10959215
> But Set objError = new ErrObject doesn't work.
I'd already suggested it wouldn't. My comment was ambiguous.

> It looks like the objError is the same global err object
It is. Atfer all it is global static declared.

There's special restrictions put on the VB ErrObject - a discussion of which is better suited to the VB area. VB does reset this at regular intervals, so you cannot wholly guarantee it's contents from one function to function.

If you truly want to persist it's value, and govern its contents, I suggest you roll out your own pseudo-ErrObject. I've had to do this before within VB itself, never mind interoperating with C++, so I know it's a pain in the ar$e.
0
 

Author Comment

by:hanzelko
ID: 10959443
Ok thanks a lot. I have though about it the same way. pseudoErrObject will be good.
0

Featured Post

What Should I Do With This Threat Intelligence?

Are you wondering if you actually need threat intelligence? The answer is yes. We explain the basics for creating useful threat intelligence.

Join & Write a Comment

Article by: SunnyDark
This article's goal is to present you with an easy to use XML wrapper for C++ and also present some interesting techniques that you might use with MS C++. The reason I built this class is to ease the pain of using XML files with C++, since there is…
Basic understanding on "OO- Object Orientation" is needed for designing a logical solution to solve a problem. Basic OOAD is a prerequisite for a coder to ensure that they follow the basic design of OO. This would help developers to understand the b…
The viewer will learn how to use the return statement in functions in C++. The video will also teach the user how to pass data to a function and have the function return data back for further processing.
The viewer will learn how to user default arguments when defining functions. This method of defining functions will be contrasted with the non-default-argument of defining functions.

757 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

19 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now