Improve company productivity with a Business Account.Sign Up

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 261
  • Last Modified:

Do I have an Ultra160 Disk Bottleneck?

Hi all,

I've been trying to determine if I indeed have an Ultra160 disk bottleneck on our system.  The system is a Netfinity 7100 running Win2k.  I've got 3 RAID 5 arrays and 1 mirrored array.  When running performance monitor during disk access slow downs, I notice that the disk queue length passes from 0 to more than 50 as soon as the total "disk byte/sec " counter reaches 40 MB/sec.  It doesn't matter if the 40 MB/sec is reached on indivudual arrays or for all the arrays combined. Unless I am dead wrong, this is well below the theoretical 160 MB/sec that Ultra 160 is supposed to deliver.

Does that indicate I have a disk subsystem bottleneck?  Is there something else I am missing or should check?  

Thanks in advance.
0
TechnoBuzz
Asked:
TechnoBuzz
1 Solution
 
CallandorCommented:
That 160 number is rarely reached, and only if the disk cache is being used, which empties out in a matter of seconds.  80MB/sec is a more realistic number for maximum throughput on the outside cylinders with everything else optimized.  A tool like HDTach will tell you what your array will deliver.
0
 
Phill_upsonCommented:
Also depends on the quality of your RAID controllers and other disks on each chain.  One cable supporting 2 hard disks might be capable of 160MB/sec theoretically, but if you have a UDMA 66 disk on the same chain, access will be held up by that disk.  Again, always worth checking the quality of your cable, bad or cheap cables can cause problems of their own.

From the HDTach reading (tool mentioned above) if you have a spare machine, try putting the disk in there on its own port and HDTach it again, that way you can try and identify if the disk is the issue and contact the manufacturer.
0
 
redking44Commented:
I have not played RAID so i can only comment on SCSI in general

it's interesting that you top out at 40 MB/sec - which is the SCSI-UW spec. ALmost any other speed and i'd say it ws a bottleneck of some sort,  but this is a stanbdard SCSI speed so i'm sure it's related.

I'd make sure the cables were really U-160 cables, and not UW cables. This may not be easy because they look identical.  I'd also check the setup in the SCSI card(s) - they can be set to work at any speed you choose, and might be throttled back to 40MB/sec..

i suppose...  are your disks really u160  drives?
0
Get expert help—faster!

Need expert help—fast? Use the Help Bell for personalized assistance getting answers to your important questions.

 
CallandorCommented:
TechnoBuzz,

Have your questions been answered?  We haven't heard from you, so why the C grade?
0
 
TechnoBuzzAuthor Commented:
Thanks for the link.

Considering this, please change the grade to a "B", since it is after all more approriate.

Thanks Callandor for your input.
0
 
CallandorCommented:
Thanks for looking over the grading guidelines.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Free Tool: IP Lookup

Get more info about an IP address or domain name, such as organization, abuse contacts and geolocation.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now