Solved

OO Design - Object Accessibility

Posted on 2004-07-30
5
198 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-15
This is less a c# question, and more of an object oriented design question in general, but since I'm using c#, I'm posting it in here.

I am a self taught programmer (books, tinkering, etc) and I seem to be having the same problem over and over again when I design more complex apps.  Here's an example:

Say that there are three classes: Class A, B, and C.

Class A contains an instance of Class B, and Class B contains an instance of Class C.

However, both Class B and Class C need to access an object that's a member of Class A.

The only way i can think of to accomplish this, is to add an instance of the object to Class B and C, and pass the required object from Class A by reference.

A. Is there a better way to do this?
B. Is this problem a result of bad design?  And if so, how could the design be changed to avoid it?
0
Comment
Question by:jdraper3
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:wolflad
ID: 11677112
A.

You are referring to classes and not instances of the classes so my suggestion would be inheritance:

Class A is the topclass. Class B inherits class A and class C inherits class B.

That way class C will have access to all methods & objects of class A & B, while B will have access to all methods & objects of class A.

B.

If A. is correct then it might be caused by bad design.
If class B is just class A with extra objects & method it should inherit A. Same goes for C to B.

If however class B is a huge class that utilizes a lot of other classes and A is just one of them (and a minor part), I would go for the way you described: Class B just uses class A.


-

If you are talking about instances of the classes however you might want to look into Singleton'ing some of the classes.

If you follow your own design, class C would be able to access class A, through class B if the instance of class A is public in class B.

Just my opinion.

-Wolf5
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:jdraper3
ID: 11680910
It's laid out so that Class A contains an array of instances of class B, which contain instances of Class C.

Class B and C both need to access objects that are part of Class A.

0
 
LVL 1

Accepted Solution

by:
wolflad earned 500 total points
ID: 11681125
Let A and B keep its arrays of B and C. In the constructor of B and C make sure you take in a reference to class A.

Here is a working example of a way to do it:

      public class A{
            public string theObject = "HOHOHO";
            B[] arrb = null;

            public A(){
                  arrb = new B[10];
                  for(int x=0;x<10;x++){
                        arrb[x] = new B(this);
                  }
            }
      }

      public class B{
            private A myRefToA = null;

            C[] arrb = null;

            public B(A inst){
                  myRefToA = inst;
                  System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("The A object from B: " + myRefToA.theObject);
                  arrb = new C[10];
                  for(int x=0;x<10;x++){
                        arrb[x] = new C(inst);
                  }
            }
      }

      public class C{
            private A myRefToA = null;
            public C(A inst){
                  myRefToA = inst;
                  System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("The A object from C: " + myRefToA.theObject);
            }
      }

Of course if you made A as a Singleton class (only 1 instance) or static class, you'd have no reason to pass the reference to class B and C.
0

Featured Post

On Demand Webinar: Networking for the Cloud Era

Did you know SD-WANs can improve network connectivity? Check out this webinar to learn how an SD-WAN simplified, one-click tool can help you migrate and manage data in the cloud.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Article by: Ivo
C# And Nullable Types Since 2.0 C# has Nullable(T) Generic Structure. The idea behind is to allow value type objects to have null values just like reference types have. This concerns scenarios where not all data sources have values (like a databa…
Article by: Najam
Having new technologies does not mean they will completely replace old components.  Recently I had to create WCF that will be called by VB6 component.  Here I will describe what steps one should follow while doing so, please feel free to post any qu…
NetCrunch network monitor is a highly extensive platform for network monitoring and alert generation. In this video you'll see a live demo of NetCrunch with most notable features explained in a walk-through manner. You'll also get to know the philos…
Sometimes it takes a new vantage point, apart from our everyday security practices, to truly see our Active Directory (AD) vulnerabilities. We get used to implementing the same techniques and checking the same areas for a breach. This pattern can re…
Suggested Courses

626 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question